The Jews’ 3,000 Centrifuge Trigger for War with Iran.
The Jews-only State’s Policy of preventing any Middle Eastern State from acquiring Nuclear Knowledge.
From the moment the jews-only state in palestine surreptitiously developed nuclear weapons, it was determined to prevent any other country in the greater middle east from developing such weapons to challenge its nuclear monopoly. The jews have been willing to use military force to prevent moslem countries from acquiring any practical nuclear experience, whether through academic nuclear research or the development of civil nuclear power, for fear this could become the first step towards the acquisition of nuclear weapons. This policy is a flagrant contradiction of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty which gives all signatories to the treaty the right to develop civil nuclear power as long as they make no effort to acquire nuclear weapons.
In 1981 the jews-only state attacked iraq’s osiraq nuclear power reactor to enforce its ban on nuclear development in the greater middle east despite the international atomic energy agency’s assurances that iraq was keeping to the rules of the npt. The jews’ attack thus elicited condemnations from around the world even from america, the instigator of the npt. "Here are excerpts from UN Security Council Resolution 487 condemning the Israeli pre-emptive strike. "Fully aware of the fact that Iraq has been a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons since it came into force in 1970, that, in accordance with that treaty, Iraq has accepted IAEA safeguards on all its nuclear activities, and that the agency has testified that these safeguards have been satisfactorily applied to date; "Strongly condemns the military attack by Israel – in clear violation of the Charter of the United Nations and the norms of international conduct; "Calls upon Israel to refrain in the future from any such acts or threats thereof; "Further considers that the said attack constitutes a serious threat to the entire IAEA safeguards regime, which is the foundation of the non-proliferation treaty."" (Gordon Prather ‘Go Ahead On: Start WWIII’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11849 November 3, 2007).
The irony of the jews’ attack was that saddam immediately launched a secret programme to acquire nuclear weapons because this was the only means of defending his country from such illegal aggression. "Since 1991, thanks to the IAEA, the whole world has known that Saddam began his quest for nuclear weapons as a direct result of the Israeli raid on his IAEA Safeguarded research reactor." [Gordon Prather ‘Go Ahead On: Start WWIII’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11849 November 3, 2007]).
It is feasible the jews-only state’s pre-emptive, and illegal, attack on syria in september 06, 2007 was another example of its use of military force to preserve its ban on the acquisition of nuclear knowledge in the greater middle east. "The New York Times reported on October 13 that Israeli planes struck at what US and Israeli intelligence believed was a partly constructed nuclear reactor in Syria on September 6, citing American and foreign officials who had seen the relevant intelligence reports. According to the report, Israel carried out the report to send a message that it would not tolerate even a nuclear program in its initial stages of construction in any neighboring state." ('USAF struck Syrian nuclear site'’ http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380718519&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull November 2, 2007).
It is important to point out the profound implications of the jews’ ‘no nuclear knowledge’ policy. Firstly, moslem states’ deposits of fossil fuels are nearing exhaustion so they have to develop new sources of energy to avert future energy shortages and thus a decline in national prosperity. Of course, they could devote themselves solely to the development of renewable forms of energy but, like all other states around the world, they regard nuclear energy as the primary means for meeting their energy requirements. Basically the jews are condemning the moslem world to what the over-industrialized world regards as second rate technologies deemed incapable of creating high rates of economic growth. Moslem countries fear, just like over-industrialized countries, that if they cannot develop nuclear power this could lead to mass immizerization with all the consequent political chaos and conflicts this could cause.
Secondly, the jews’ policy of banning moslem countries from exercising their npt treaty rights to exploit nuclear energy is a clear an example of jewish supremacism not merely over middle eastern states but over internationally agreed treaties. The greater the moslem world’s energy shortages become, the more obvious will be its enslavement to the racist state. The jews are denying moslem countries civil nuclear power because of their paranoid fears of nuclear proliferation and, as will be seen, they have succeeded in fooling many western governments into sympathizing with such fears even though such a policy could lead to the increasing immizerization of the moslem world. They are hyping up the west’s fears of a nuclear attack by moslem countries to co-opt the west into helping the jews to impoverish the moslem world.
Thirdly, the great geopolitical theorist m.k. bhadrakumar puts this issue in a wider perspective to highlight how punitive and regressive the jews’ policy is. "Man has never before in his bloody history waged preemptive war against the spread of knowledge. The nearest he came was with the Inquisition when he insisted knowledge was heresy. But when Bush warns of preemptive war, it must be taken seriously." (M K Bhadrakumar ‘Iran looms over Turkey crisis diplomacy’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IJ25Ak01.html October 25, 2007).
Bush’s New ‘No Nuclear Knowledge’ Policy is the Policy of the Jews-only State.
America was the inspiring force behind the npt and was thus committed to helping countries to develop civil nuclear power. Whilst a succession of american administrations have been determined to stop iran from acquiring nuclear weapons they have accepted, albeit reluctantly, its right to develop civil nuclear power. However, in october 2007, george bush unilaterally announced he was changing this policy. "If Iran had a nuclear weapon, it would be a dangerous threat to world peace…. So I told people that if you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon." (George Bush quoted in Farideh Farhi ‘Putin's Trip to Tehran’ http://icga.blogspot.com/2007/10/putins-trip-to-tehran.html October 17, 2007). Bush was unilaterally revoking iran’s right to develop civil nuclear power. In effect, he was adopting the policy of the jews-only state. "The Israelis, on the other hand, have repeatedly expressed their outrageous view that the capability of enriching the Uranium-235 content of large amounts of natural uranium to any level is tantamount to having the capability to make a nuclear weapon. Are they serious? Well, back in 1981 Israel "took out" Osiraq, a French-built IAEA-safeguarded research reactor, apparently because they had concluded that Saddam Hussein expected Osiraq, in lieu of the Tooth Fairy, to miraculously leave a few nuclear weapons under his pillow. Now, Bush the Younger has apparently adopted the equally idiotic and outrageously inflammatory view of the Israelis about Iran’s IAEA Safeguarded programs." (Gordon Prather ‘Go Ahead On: Start WWIII’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11849 November 3, 2007).
It might be argued bush was just borrowing a rational, sensible, policy from another country but, given the profusion of critical policies he seems to have ‘borrowed’ from the jews-only state, it would be more accurate to suggest the jews-only state was yet again determining his foreign policies.
Since the end of the second world war, america has been the world’s beacon of democracy whilst the jews-only state could be located at the other end of the civilized-uncivilized spectrum i.e. a racist state refusing to abide by international law. Over the last forty years or so, but dramatically so since bush came to power, america has adopted so many policies from the jews-only state that it has, in effect, shifted to the opposite end of the spectrum to join the racist state as a rogue nation. The defence strategy of the jews-only state has been based on: pre-emptive military action against a suspected threat; the necessity for fighting wars abroad to avoid having to fight them on their own soil; unilateralism; and disdain for international law and the united nations. Since its foundation the jews-only state has illegally detained tens of thousands of people, even its own citizens, without trial; it has systematically used torture against its prisoners; and has long expressed racist hatred for arabs and moslems. It has successfully exported these policies to its allies in america. America’s ruling jewish elite have implemented these policies to deal with america’s political problems most of which have been caused by the jews-only state. In summary when comparing the policies of the two countries, the jews-only state, in conjunction with its jewish allies in america, has transformed america into its own image whilst america has totally failed to civilize the racist state and bring it into the community of nations. Another blatant example of this zionization process is that for three decades american administrations failed to force the jews to sign up to the npt but now bush has now joined the jews’ in their opposition to this american inspired treaty. That jews have taken over much of america’s political system is transparent from the migration of policies from the jews-only state to america rather than the other way around.
The Jews’ trigger for War with Iran.
Historically, the jews-only state was unable to prevent iran from starting up a nuclear power industry. The more progress iran made on developing nuclear power facilities, the more belligerent the jews became. Once bush was elected, the jews-only state started threatening to launch a military attack on iran’s nuclear power facilities. It drew a line in the sand proposing to that military action might have to be taken if iran succeeded in running 3,000 gas centrifuges in its uranium enrichment plant. The jews argued this number of centrifuges would enable it to enrich uranium-235 beyond the 5% needed to fuel a nuclear power plant, to the 95% level needed for a nuclear weapon. If they could not diplomatically stop iran from reaching this number of centrifuges they might have to resort to military action. Thus the jews made this figure their "point of no return" i.e. their trigger for a pre-emptive and illegal attack on iran’s nuclear facilities. The jews have gained support for this policy from their quislings in the bush regime and in many other governments throughout the western world.
Whilst the jews-only state has been threatening to attack iran, america’s ruling jewish elite has been pressuring the bush regime into launching a proxy zionist war against iran. The jewish neocons have been frothing madly that the bush regime should embark on a third world war to break up middle eastern countries into mini-states that would never accumulate the resources to develop civil nuclear power let alone nuclear weapons. An attack on iran could easily escalate into a regional war. It could also escalate into the third world war being demanded by the poisonous jewish neocons. A new world war could result in the deaths of thousands of american troops and cause america and the west to suffer even greater economic and military calamities than they have because of their proxy zionist invasions of afghanistan and iraq. It could produce a global recession in which few people around the world would remain unscathed. The jews are pushing the world into a catastrophic third world war because of their warmongering paranoia over iran’s non-existent nuclear weapons.
IAEA Scientists state that 3,000 Centrifuges cannot make a Nuclear Bomb.
The specific allegation the jews are presenting to persuade the world of the necessity for a war against iran is that if iran succeeds in running 3,000 gas centrifuges for a year this would enable it to produce a nuclear bomb. "There is a civilian program, a secret weapons program, and Iran is expanding its ballistic missile power," Israeli Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz told reporters here on Nov. 8. Mofaz, who is serving as Jerusalem's lead negotiator in the U.S.-Israel strategic dialogue, said the need to isolate Iran had increased urgency. He pointed to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's announcement that his country is now operating 3,000 centrifuges, the number required to enrich bomb-grade uranium." (Ron Kampeas ‘Israel, U.S. Jews intensify efforts to isolate Iran’ http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/news/article/20071111heinleinmofaz.html November 11, 2007). This accusation is a lie. It is not possible for 3,000 gas centrifuges to enrich uranium to such a degree as to produce a fissile nuclear weapon. The international atomic energy agency believes there is no scientific basis to the jews’ allegation.
September 08, 2007.
"But ElBaradei observed in an interview with The Financial Times on February 19 that even if Iran had 3,000 or more centrifuges operating, they could not go beyond 5% enrichment, which would be far below what would be required for weapons-grade uranium, as long they remain under an IAEA inspection regime." (Gareth Porter ‘Iran spinning centrifuges - and half-truths’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II08Ak02.html September 08, 2007).
October 01, 2007.
"A diplomat in Vienna, where the I.A.E.A. is based, said, "The Iranians are years away from making a bomb, as ElBaradei has said all along. Running three thousand centrifuges does not make a bomb."" (Seymour M. Hersh ‘Shifting Targets: The Administration’s plan for Iran’ http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/10/08/071008fa_fact_hersh October 01, 2007).
The Jews hyping up Iran’s Nuclear Threat.
The jews are hyping up iran’s nuclear threat by accusing it of being on the verge of acquiring a ‘nuclear weapon’. They are trying to deceive the western world into believing iran is close to creating a fissile nuclear bomb producing the characteristic mushroom cloud whereas the most iran could create would be a ‘dirty bomb’ or ‘suitcase bomb’. Iran could use the 5% enriched uranium for its nuclear power station to contaminate a conventional bomb. "An Israeli official said, "Our main focus has been the Iranian nuclear facilities, not because other things aren’t important. We’ve worked on missile technology and terrorism, but we see the Iranian nuclear issue as one that cuts across everything." Iran, he added, does not need to develop an actual warhead to be a threat. "Our problems begin when they learn and master the nuclear fuel cycle and when they have the nuclear materials," he said. There was, for example, the possibility of a "dirty bomb," or of Iran’s passing materials to terrorist groups." (Seymour M. Hersh ‘Shifting Targets: The Administration’s plan for Iran’ http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/10/08/071008fa_fact_hersh October 01, 2007).
The effectiveness of the jews’ propaganda against iran is that a dirty bomb is commonly regarded with as much fear as a fissile nuclear weapon. In reality it is only marginally more destructive than the same conventional bomb without the nuclear contaminants but is nothing like as awesomely destructive as a fissile nuclear bomb. The western public regards a dirty bomb with great fear primarily because it has an irrational fear of the dangers posed by nuclear radiation. The numbers of people who would be killed by radiation scattered from a dirty bomb would be smaller than those killed by the conventional explosives alone, but such a bomb induces psychological terror because of common fears about the lethality of nuclear radiation. Indeed, any country around the world has the potential to create a dirty bomb. All they would need to do is buy up a couple of thousand cheap watches with luminous dials and then pad the dials around some conventional explosives and hey presto a ‘nuclear bomb’. Iran would not benefit militarily from acquiring dirty bombs. They would not increase iran’s military threat.
The jews are trying to win popular support in the west for an attack on iran on the pretext that they have to defend themselves from an iranian nuclear weapon. A lot of people in the west would accept this justification not simply because they are islamophobic but because they acknowledge that countries have a right to defend themselves from a military attack. But the jews are misleading such sympathizers. They are pretending iran is close to getting a fissile nuclear bomb when in fact the most it could achieve would be a measly dirty bomb using uranium enriched to 5% for civil nuclear power stations. If people support the jews’ rationale for military action they are in effect condoning an attack on iran merely for acquiring civil nuclear power.
The jews are perpetuating a hoax that iran is on the verge of creating a ‘nuclear bomb’ when what they really mean, but very rarely state in public, is just a mere ‘dirty bomb’. This is even more of a deception given that iranian leaders have repeatedly stated they do not want to acquire nuclear weapons because they believe such weapons are un-islamic.
The Jews trying to dupe the Bush regime and the American public with their 3,000 Centrifuge Mumbo Jumbo.
The jews-only state alleges iran could produce a fissile nuclear bomb from running 3,000 centrifuges but it cannot provide the scientific proof for this allegation. Such proof is even more imperative given that a war against iran could cause a global catastrophe. Surely, if the jews are to attack iran causing the outbreak of a third world war then their scientific evidence should be beyond doubt. But they have no such evidence. They cannot provide any scientific evidence to support their paranoid allegation. As a consequence, just as the jews pushed the bush regime and the american public into an invasion of iraq to destroy saddam’s non-existent nuclear weapons, so they are doing exactly the same as regards iran’s non-existent nuclear weapons.
The bush regime has implied that if iran suspends its nuclear enrichment programme then it will talk to iran’s president, whom it has depicted as adolf hitler, about all the outstanding issues between the two countries. However, just as was the case with saddam, if iran complies with this ultimatum then the bush regime will then insist on iran meeting a string of other demands before negotiations take place. For example, that iran should dismantle its nuclear facilities before discussions start. Iran has no option other than to proceed with what it is doing.
Iran’s right to develop Nuclear Power is being blocked by the Jews’ fear of a Dirty Bomb.
Iran has sought to placate the west’s concerns over its development of nuclear power by proposing to restrict the number of centrifuges in its nuclear enrichment plant solely to that required to enrich uranium to the level of 5% needed to fuel a nuclear power station. It is willing to accept monitoring systems and inspections so that it could not go beyond the installation of 3,000 centrifuges without triggering immediate attention to what it was doing. (Even if iran suddenly decided to increase the number of centrifuges, it would require a significant leap in its technological expertise to be able to produce 95% enriched uranium for a fissile nuclear bomb. This would provide the world with ample time to present iran with an ultimatum). This compromise should make both sides happy. Iran would be able to fuel its nuclear power stations and the west would not have to fear iran developing fissile nuclear bombs.
The west, however, has refused to accept this sensible and entirely reasonable compromise. It wants iran to stop all enrichment and abandon its dreams of civil nuclear power. It is willing to abrogate iran’s rights under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty to develop a nuclear power industry. The jews are paranoid that iran might either use 5% enriched uranium to provide itself with a militarily useless dirty bomb or that it could increase the number of centrifuges to produce 95% enriched uranium for a fissile nuclear bomb so quickly that the world would not have time to stop this from happening. "In the brief 2005 negotiations with the European Union Three (EU-3: Britain, France and Germany), Iran submitted a formal proposal offering to negotiate a mutually acceptable ceiling on the number of centrifuges at Natanz, which would be producing low-enriched uranium that could not be used to make weapons, and "continuous on-site" inspection by IAEA nuclear specialists at all facilities to provide "unprecedented added guarantees". The EU-3 refused to discuss the proposal with Tehran." (Gareth Porter ‘Iran spinning centrifuges - and half-truths’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II08Ak02.html September 08, 2007).
Ahmadinejad declares Iran has 3,000 working centrifuges.
Ahmadinejad’s Announcement - November 07, 2007.
At the beginning of november 2007, the nuclear stand-off between the jews-only state and iran reached a critical turning point when mahmoud ahmadinejad announced iran had succeeded in running 3,000 centrifuges in its nuclear enrichment plant. "Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's announcement Wednesday that Iran had 3,000 working centrifuges raised fears in Washington that Israel would respond to the statement with a preemptive military strike, the Times reported Thursday. Ahmadinejad announced that Iran has achieved a landmark, with 3,000 centrifuges fully operational in its uranium enrichment program. "We have now reached 3,000 machines," Ahmadinejad told thousands of Iranians gathered in Birjand, eastern Iran, in a show of defiance of international demands to halt the program believed to be masking the country's nuclear arms efforts. Ahmadinejad has previously said Iran had succeeded in installing the 3,000 centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility at Natanz. But Wednesday's claim was his first official statement that the plant is now operating all those centrifuges. When Iran first announced launching the 3,000 centrifuges in April, the UN nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Teheran had only 328 centrifuges up and running at Natanz's underground facility. In a recent report, drawn up by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, the agency put the number of centrifuges working in Natanz at close to 2,000, with another 650 being tested. Although Ahmadinejad was not totally precise, the tone and setting of his Wednesday speech reflected he clearly meant the 3,000 were fully operational." (Yaakov Katz and Mark Weiss ‘'US afraid of an Israeli strike following Iranian announcement' http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380761787&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull November 08, 2007).
Jews declare Ahmadinejad is Lying - November 08, 2007.
The jews’ immediately dismissed ahmadinejad’s announcement. Having drawn their line in the sand at 3,000 centrifuges, the jews seemed to believe such an announcement was just a political ploy to deflate criticisms before iran achieved this figure for real. "Israeli officials said they did not believe Ahmadinejad's claims about the 3,000 centrifuges. Jerusalem believes the Iranian president is lying in an effort to create the impression that Teheran already has a nuclear bomb and has passed the point of no return. Teheran hopes that this will deter international resolve for tougher sanctions, according to this view. But according to the Israeli officials, not only does Israel not believe Ahmadinejad, the international community has also not been fooled." (Yaakov Katz, Mark Weiss ‘'US afraid of an Israeli strike following Iranian announcement' http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380761787&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull November 08, 2007).
IAEA’s Report confirms Iran is Running 3,000 Centrifuges - November 15, 2007.
However, a week later the iaea released its latest report on its intense monitoring of iran’s nuclear facilities and stated that iran was indeed running 3,000 centrifuges thereby confirming the veracity of ahmadinejad’s statement. "A senior UN official confirmed a claim by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that Iran had reached a key target of 3,000 centrifuges enriching uranium." (Olivier Knox ‘US talks tough over Iran, warns China’ http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071115/pl_afp/usirannuclearunchina_071115213315 November 15, 2007); "What ElBaradei "verified" was that Iran had finished installing eighteen 164-machine cascades and that uranium-hexafluoride had been fed into all 18 cascades. ElBaradei also reported that the "feed rate" as well as the enrichment level, both of which the IAEA "audits", have remained low." (Gordon Prather ‘IAEA Again Verifies Iranian Compliance’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11923 November 17, 2007).
The Jewish Conspiracy to spread the Lie that running 3,000 Centrifuges for a year could create a Fissile Nuclear Bomb.
A Jewish Conspiracy to deceive the World into initiating World War Three.
The jews have no scientific evidence to back up their scandalous allegation that iran’s 3,000 centrifuges could enrich uranium for a fissile nuclear bomb. The world’s leading experts on nuclear power have insisted this is not feasible especially given the primitive machines being used by iran. The jews have no scientific evidence but they do have the political and media power to spread their lie around the western world and present it as scientific fact. Below is a list of the journalists who have repeated the jews-only state’s lie in america’s mainstream media. It seems plausible to suspect that these so-called journalists have been briefed either by the likudniks in the bush regime or by the jews-only lobby to reiterate the same lie. And it also has to be suspected they have been complicit in publicizing this lie by giving the jews’ allegation the flimsiest degree of scientific credibility by referring to ineffable "scientists" or "US experts". None of these journalists has verified their stories by quoting the opinions of a respected, named, nuclear scientist.
Ian Bruce.
"Although intelligence estimates vary as to when Iran will achieve the know-how for a bomb, the French government recently received a memo from the International Atomic Energy Agency stating that Iran will be ready to run almost 3000 centrifuges in 18 cascades by the end of this month. That is in defiance of a UN ban on uranium enrichment and would be enough to produce a nuclear weapon within a year." (Ian Bruce ‘Secret move to upgrade air base for Iran attack plans’ http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/foreign/display.var.1792035.0.0.php October 29 2007).
Yaakov Katz and Mark Weiss.
"Uranium gas, spun in linked centrifuges, can result in either low-enriched fuel suitable to generate power in a nuclear reactor, or the weapons-grade material that forms the fissile core of nuclear warheads. US experts say 3,000 centrifuges are enough to produce a nuclear weapon, perhaps as soon as within a year." (Yaakov Katz and Mark Weiss ‘'US afraid of an Israeli strike following Iranian announcement' http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380761787&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull November 08, 2007).
Tom Baldwin, James Hider, and Francis Elliott.
"US experts say 3,000 machines running for long periods could make enough enriched uranium for an atomic bomb within a year." (Tom Baldwin, James Hider, and Francis Elliott ‘US fears Israeli strike against Iran over latest nuclear claim’ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2827787.ece November 8, 2007). These journos not only refer to the ubiquitous but delphic us experts, they use a rather imprecise formulation: 3,000 machines "running for long periods of time". Apparently however not longer than a year.
Olivier Knox.
"Scientists say that number (3,000 centrifuges) could be sufficient to produce enough enriched uranium in one year to make a single nuclear bomb." (Olivier Knox ‘US talks tough over Iran, warns China’ http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071115/pl_afp/usirannuclearunchina_071115213315 November 15, 2007).
Maggie Farley.
"Last week, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that a cascade of 3,000 centrifuges was operating and the country's nuclear program was "irreversible." If the cascade is functioning properly, at that rate the Iranians could enrich enough uranium for a bomb in about a year, scientists say, though U.S. intelligence estimates put Tehran between four and seven years away from constructing a complete weapon." (Maggie Farley ‘Iran reveals how it built nuclear program, U.N. says’ http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fairenough/latimesD27.html November 15, 2007).
Farley inadvertently and unintentionally contradicted herself when trying to provide the jews’ allegation with a degree of scientific credibility. She mentioned american intelligence estimates that iran is 4-7 years away from creating a bomb. But surely if america’s intelligence services knew scientifically that iran could create a fissile nuclear bomb within a year using 3000 centrifuges then it wouldn’t be arguing iran was 4-7 year away from creating a bomb. This blatant contradiction adds to the suspicion this journalist, like many others, took her cue from likudniks in the bush regime or the jewish lobby rather than from nuclear scientists.
Elaine Sciolino and William J. Broad.
"In the report, the agency confirmed for the first time that Iran had reached the major milestone of 3,000 operating centrifuges, a tenfold increase from just a year ago. In theory, that means that it could produce enough uranium to make a nuclear weapon within a year to 18 months. The report could also fuel debate about how much time is left for diplomacy to succeed. The confirmation that Iran has 3,000 operational centrifuges suggests that it is quickly moving to a position where it could, if it wanted to, produce a bomb. Iran has denied that it seeks a nuclear weapon." (Elaine Sciolino and William J. Broad ‘Report Raises New Doubts on Iran Nuclear Program’ http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/16/world/middleeast/16nuke.html?ex=1352869200&en=82d491ab9329016a&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss November 16, 2007).
Gordon prather produced a critique of this new york times article. He feigns bewilderment as to who put forward the proposition that 3,000 centrifuges could create nuclear weapons. "What neo-crazy crackpot told gullible [or complicit?] New York Times' reporters that gas centrifuges could produce uranium at all, much less produce weapons-grade almost pure Uranium-235? Uranium-enrichment plants don't "produce" uranium, they "cast out" the Uranium-238 istopes from the uranium-hexafluoride fed them." (Gordon Prather ‘IAEA Again Verifies Iranian Compliance’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11923 November 17, 2007).
Robin Wright, Peter Baker and Michael Abramowitz.
"This week's report by the IAEA confirmed that Iran has reached the technical milestone of 3,000 centrifuges, which could produce enough highly enriched uranium to make a nuclear weapon in a year, if all are working. Many experts believe Iran is still facing technical difficulties with its centrifuges, however." (Robin Wright. Staff writers Peter Baker and Michael Abramowitz contributed to this report. ‘Deepening China-Iran Ties Weaken Bid to Isolate Iran’ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/17/AR2007111701680_pf.html November 18, 2007).
Matthew Schofield.
"In fact, Iran has expanded its enrichment program, reaching a so-called "magic number" of 3,000 working centrifuges, which most experts believe could produce enough highly enriched uranium in one year to make a nuclear weapon. Enriched uranium is used for research and energy generation, as well as for weapons. Weapons grade uranium is enriched to 90 percent U-235, while electric power plants are fueled by uranium enriched to less than 5 percent. The enrichment equipment and the process to create both are similar. As one nuclear inspector summed up: "You just spin it longer to highly enrich."" (Matthew Schofield ‘As U.S. presses for more sanctions, nations remain divided on Iran’ http://www.mcclatchydc.com/243/story/21650.html November 18, 2007).
Conclusions
It has been noted. "News media have routinely repeated the statement that 3,000 centrifuges could enrich enough uranium to make a bomb, provided the machines run for the requisite periods." (Gareth Porter ‘Iran spinning centrifuges - and half-truths’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II08Ak02.html September 08, 2007). But, it is surely more than just a bizarre coincidence that most of america’s mainstream journalists plugged the jews-only state’s lie about iran’s capability for producing nuclear weapons and sought to give credence to such a lie by citing unnamed scientists/experts. The reason for this unanimity is that america’s mainstream media is controlled by zionists who are willing to contribute to the jewish conspiracy to demonize iran.
The zionist dominated american media publicized the alleged critical importance of the 3,000 centrifuge figure not merely because it provided the jews-only state with a justification for military action but because it provided bush with favourable publicity should he decide to attack iran.
It has been surprising to discover that one of america’s few commentators who seemed capable of detecting the hidden hand of the jews-only lobby has ended up peddling one of its most prominent lies. "We are not out of the woods yet. If Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is telling the truth about those 3,000 centrifuges working perfectly, Iran could have the nuclear material for a single bomb in a year." (Patrick J. Buchanan ‘Is World War III on Hold?’ http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=11899 November 13, 2007).
Ahmadinejad’s Nuclear Policy under dispute in Iran.
There is another ruse used by the zionist dominated western media to add credibility to the notion that iran is on the verge of creating a fissile nuclear weapon.
After ahmadinejad’s statement that iran had linked up 3,000 centrifuges, the western media suddenly started reporting increased levels of criticisms in iran against ahmadinejad’s nuclear policy. "During more than two years as Iranian president, Mahmud Ahmadinejad has made his share of provocative statements. In October 2005, he famously cast doubt on the Holocaust. And in New York in September, he claimed that no homosexuals lived in Iran. But until this week, the hardline president had never publicly called his own internal critics "traitors", including those from his own conservative party in the government of the Islamic Republic. Ahmadinejad, in a speech this week at Tehran's Science and Technology University, denounced what he called "traitors" to Iran's nuclear program. He threatened to name and shame these critics unless they ended pressure to change Iran's nuclear policy. The harshness of his attack points to a serious rift within the establishment about how Ahmadinejad's hard line is driving Iran into international isolation." (Breffni O'Rourke ‘Iran gets tough on nuclear 'traitors'’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IK16Ak02.html November 16, 2007). The implication being that ahmadinejad’s critics were becoming more vocal because they also believed the 3,000 centrifuge figure was the critical point for creating a fissile nuclear weapon – thus reinforcing the correctness of the jews’ fabrication.
O'rourke also adds credence to the jews’ fabrication by implying that china had felt it necessary to turn against ahmadinejad now that iran is close to acquiring a fissile nuclear bomb. "And he (Hassan Rohani, head of Khatami's nuclear negotiating team).criticized what he called the failure of Iranian diplomacy on the nuclear issue, saying that to succeed in diplomacy means preventing enemies from becoming allies with other countries - an apparent reference to recent moves by Germany, France and even China to more directly confront Iran over its nuclear program." (Breffni O'Rourke ‘Iran gets tough on nuclear 'traitors'’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IK16Ak02.html November 16, 2007).
It was simply not true, however, that china has shifted away from iran. On the contrary, it welcomed iran’s cooperation with the iaea and seems to be even more willing to block a third round of sanctions on iran. "As long as the process moves a bit forward, we should keep on this track," a Chinese diplomat said. "The main thing for the Security Council is to help the IAEA answer these outstanding questions, and we are not convinced that additional sanctions would help." (Maggie Farley ‘Iran reveals how it built nuclear program, U.N. says’ http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fairenough/latimesD27.html November 15, 2007).
Russia has also signaled its opposition to a third round of security council sanctions. Firstly, by stating it is prepared to complete the bushehr nuclear reactor. "Russian President Vladimir Putin recently vowed that his country would complete the construction of Iran's first nuclear power station on time and on Nov. 26 begin preparing to deliver low-enriched nuclear fuel to Iran. The head of Russia's Atomic Energy Agency, Sergei Kiriyenko, recently said that Iran's new nuclear reactor "creates no risks for nuclear weapons proliferation."" (Matthew Schofield ‘As U.S. presses for more sanctions, nations remain divided on Iran’ http://www.mcclatchydc.com/243/story/21650.html November 18, 2007).
Secondly, by voting to abandon a peace treaty between the two former superpowers it seems to be growing increasingly impatient with the wild accusations being leveled against iran. "The Russian senate voted Friday to suspend compliance with a key Cold War treaty limiting conventional military forces across Europe, drawing renewed Western criticism. The treaty's demise highlights deteriorating relations between Moscow and countries of the Atlantic alliance as Putin's administration pushes to reassert Russia on the international stage." (Nick Coleman ‘Russia abandons key Cold War arms treaty’ http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071116/wl_afp/russianatomilitarytreatycfe5thleadwrap;_ylt=Ag9Uj_s_l1FWjHThGnZjl8Cs0NUE November 16, 2007).
The Pieces are falling in place for an attack on Iran.
Over the last few years the jews-only state has proposed the figure of 3000 centrifuges as a trigger for an attack on iran to stop its alleged development of a fissile nuclear weapon. Iran has now reached this figure so an attack seems more feasible. But, not necessarily an imminent attack. The jews will likely wait to see if the security council imposes a third round of sanctions on iran. It is likely they will also wait for a report to be published at the end of november 2007 by the european union's foreign-policy chief, javier solana to see if europe comes up with some effective sanctions against iran. If there are no further sanctions from either the security council or the european union then the jews may well feel they have reached the end of their diplomatic options. A number of leading jews stated earlier this year that the jews-only state should give the world until the end of 2007 to solve the problem diplomatically. If this did not happen it should consider the military option.
The last hurdle for the jews to face would be to try and manipulate america into attacking iran. If they cannot do so they will be left to act themselves - even though once iran retaliates america will become involved. "A claim by President Ahmadinejad that Iran has 3,000 working uranium-enriching centrifuges sent a tremor across the world yesterday amid fears that Israel would respond by bombing the country’s nuclear facilities. Military sources in Washington said that the existence of such a large number could be a "tipping point", triggering an Israeli air strike. The Pentagon is reluctant to take military action against Iran, but officials say that Israel is a "different matter". Amid the international uproar, British MPs who were to have toured the nuclear facility were backing out of their Iran trip. Even before President Ahmadinejad’s announcement, a US defence official told The Times yesterday: "Israel could do something when they get to around 3,000 working centrifuges. The Pentagon is minded to wait a little longer."" (Tom Baldwin, James Hider, and Francis Elliott ‘US fears Israeli strike against Iran over latest nuclear claim’ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2827787.ece November 8, 2007).
Are the Jews really willing to sacrifice America and the World in order to attack Iran?
The article quoted in the previous paragraph was published in rupert murdoch’s timesonline and suggested the bush regime fears the jews-only state will attack iran. There is no mention that if the jews do launch such an attack then they will put hundreds of thousands of american troops in harms way. If iran retaliates against a jewish attack it could lead to the deaths of thousands of american troops. In effect, the jews would be responsible for killing thousands of american troops.
The jews-only state, and america’s jewish ruling elite, pushed america into proxy zionist invasions of afghanistan and iraq. They believed the invasions would be a cakewalk and that the costs of the wars would be funded by increased iraqi oil exports. These invasions have turned out to be a calamity for both afghanistan and iraq. They have been an economic, political, and military, disaster for america. But they have also been a huge boost to jewish supremacism in the middle east. A war against iran is likely to exacerbate these diverging trends. It would be a catastrophe for american lives, treasure, and reputation, whilst further consolidating jewish supremacism in the middle east. It would become impossible to avoid the conclusion that the jews pushed america into these invasions to benefit the jews-only state at america’s expense.
Jewish commentators and jewish think tanks have invented, elaborated upon, and promoted, the idea of a third world war. The zionist dominated media has gone out of its way to publicize, encourage, and legitimize, such warmongering. If it became common knowledge that jewish commentators, the jewish lobby, and the zionist dominated media were responsible for the catastrophes in america and the west it is possible that public opinion would turn against them. It cannot be expected that those who most fervently advocated world war three should not be punished for any calamity which might ensue. Jewish neocons and the jewish lobby were responsible for pushing america into the disaster it suffered in iraq. It was the failure of american politicians/media to punish those who advocated this war that enabled these paranoid warmongers to advocate yet another war. Surely pushing the world into a third world war should be regarded as a war crime and those convicted should be duly punished? Those initiating the third world war should be punished in exactly the same way as those who pushed the world into the second world war.
It would be the height of political absurdity to suggest that these criticisms of jewish warmongers should not be made because they might constitute anti-semitism. Accusations of anti-semitism simply pale in comparison to the war crimes committed by those provoking a third world war. Allegations of anti-semitism should not be allowed to cover up the war crimes being committed by jewish racists. A world in which jewish racists can get away with denouncing anti-racists as anti-semites in order to cover up their responsibility for a third world war, is a world being run by jewish nazis. The jewish neocons are as barbaric and warmongering as their nazi counterparts.
From the moment the jews-only state in palestine surreptitiously developed nuclear weapons, it was determined to prevent any other country in the greater middle east from developing such weapons to challenge its nuclear monopoly. The jews have been willing to use military force to prevent moslem countries from acquiring any practical nuclear experience, whether through academic nuclear research or the development of civil nuclear power, for fear this could become the first step towards the acquisition of nuclear weapons. This policy is a flagrant contradiction of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty which gives all signatories to the treaty the right to develop civil nuclear power as long as they make no effort to acquire nuclear weapons.
In 1981 the jews-only state attacked iraq’s osiraq nuclear power reactor to enforce its ban on nuclear development in the greater middle east despite the international atomic energy agency’s assurances that iraq was keeping to the rules of the npt. The jews’ attack thus elicited condemnations from around the world even from america, the instigator of the npt. "Here are excerpts from UN Security Council Resolution 487 condemning the Israeli pre-emptive strike. "Fully aware of the fact that Iraq has been a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons since it came into force in 1970, that, in accordance with that treaty, Iraq has accepted IAEA safeguards on all its nuclear activities, and that the agency has testified that these safeguards have been satisfactorily applied to date; "Strongly condemns the military attack by Israel – in clear violation of the Charter of the United Nations and the norms of international conduct; "Calls upon Israel to refrain in the future from any such acts or threats thereof; "Further considers that the said attack constitutes a serious threat to the entire IAEA safeguards regime, which is the foundation of the non-proliferation treaty."" (Gordon Prather ‘Go Ahead On: Start WWIII’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11849 November 3, 2007).
The irony of the jews’ attack was that saddam immediately launched a secret programme to acquire nuclear weapons because this was the only means of defending his country from such illegal aggression. "Since 1991, thanks to the IAEA, the whole world has known that Saddam began his quest for nuclear weapons as a direct result of the Israeli raid on his IAEA Safeguarded research reactor." [Gordon Prather ‘Go Ahead On: Start WWIII’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11849 November 3, 2007]).
It is feasible the jews-only state’s pre-emptive, and illegal, attack on syria in september 06, 2007 was another example of its use of military force to preserve its ban on the acquisition of nuclear knowledge in the greater middle east. "The New York Times reported on October 13 that Israeli planes struck at what US and Israeli intelligence believed was a partly constructed nuclear reactor in Syria on September 6, citing American and foreign officials who had seen the relevant intelligence reports. According to the report, Israel carried out the report to send a message that it would not tolerate even a nuclear program in its initial stages of construction in any neighboring state." ('USAF struck Syrian nuclear site'’ http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380718519&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull November 2, 2007).
It is important to point out the profound implications of the jews’ ‘no nuclear knowledge’ policy. Firstly, moslem states’ deposits of fossil fuels are nearing exhaustion so they have to develop new sources of energy to avert future energy shortages and thus a decline in national prosperity. Of course, they could devote themselves solely to the development of renewable forms of energy but, like all other states around the world, they regard nuclear energy as the primary means for meeting their energy requirements. Basically the jews are condemning the moslem world to what the over-industrialized world regards as second rate technologies deemed incapable of creating high rates of economic growth. Moslem countries fear, just like over-industrialized countries, that if they cannot develop nuclear power this could lead to mass immizerization with all the consequent political chaos and conflicts this could cause.
Secondly, the jews’ policy of banning moslem countries from exercising their npt treaty rights to exploit nuclear energy is a clear an example of jewish supremacism not merely over middle eastern states but over internationally agreed treaties. The greater the moslem world’s energy shortages become, the more obvious will be its enslavement to the racist state. The jews are denying moslem countries civil nuclear power because of their paranoid fears of nuclear proliferation and, as will be seen, they have succeeded in fooling many western governments into sympathizing with such fears even though such a policy could lead to the increasing immizerization of the moslem world. They are hyping up the west’s fears of a nuclear attack by moslem countries to co-opt the west into helping the jews to impoverish the moslem world.
Thirdly, the great geopolitical theorist m.k. bhadrakumar puts this issue in a wider perspective to highlight how punitive and regressive the jews’ policy is. "Man has never before in his bloody history waged preemptive war against the spread of knowledge. The nearest he came was with the Inquisition when he insisted knowledge was heresy. But when Bush warns of preemptive war, it must be taken seriously." (M K Bhadrakumar ‘Iran looms over Turkey crisis diplomacy’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IJ25Ak01.html October 25, 2007).
Bush’s New ‘No Nuclear Knowledge’ Policy is the Policy of the Jews-only State.
America was the inspiring force behind the npt and was thus committed to helping countries to develop civil nuclear power. Whilst a succession of american administrations have been determined to stop iran from acquiring nuclear weapons they have accepted, albeit reluctantly, its right to develop civil nuclear power. However, in october 2007, george bush unilaterally announced he was changing this policy. "If Iran had a nuclear weapon, it would be a dangerous threat to world peace…. So I told people that if you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon." (George Bush quoted in Farideh Farhi ‘Putin's Trip to Tehran’ http://icga.blogspot.com/2007/10/putins-trip-to-tehran.html October 17, 2007). Bush was unilaterally revoking iran’s right to develop civil nuclear power. In effect, he was adopting the policy of the jews-only state. "The Israelis, on the other hand, have repeatedly expressed their outrageous view that the capability of enriching the Uranium-235 content of large amounts of natural uranium to any level is tantamount to having the capability to make a nuclear weapon. Are they serious? Well, back in 1981 Israel "took out" Osiraq, a French-built IAEA-safeguarded research reactor, apparently because they had concluded that Saddam Hussein expected Osiraq, in lieu of the Tooth Fairy, to miraculously leave a few nuclear weapons under his pillow. Now, Bush the Younger has apparently adopted the equally idiotic and outrageously inflammatory view of the Israelis about Iran’s IAEA Safeguarded programs." (Gordon Prather ‘Go Ahead On: Start WWIII’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11849 November 3, 2007).
It might be argued bush was just borrowing a rational, sensible, policy from another country but, given the profusion of critical policies he seems to have ‘borrowed’ from the jews-only state, it would be more accurate to suggest the jews-only state was yet again determining his foreign policies.
Since the end of the second world war, america has been the world’s beacon of democracy whilst the jews-only state could be located at the other end of the civilized-uncivilized spectrum i.e. a racist state refusing to abide by international law. Over the last forty years or so, but dramatically so since bush came to power, america has adopted so many policies from the jews-only state that it has, in effect, shifted to the opposite end of the spectrum to join the racist state as a rogue nation. The defence strategy of the jews-only state has been based on: pre-emptive military action against a suspected threat; the necessity for fighting wars abroad to avoid having to fight them on their own soil; unilateralism; and disdain for international law and the united nations. Since its foundation the jews-only state has illegally detained tens of thousands of people, even its own citizens, without trial; it has systematically used torture against its prisoners; and has long expressed racist hatred for arabs and moslems. It has successfully exported these policies to its allies in america. America’s ruling jewish elite have implemented these policies to deal with america’s political problems most of which have been caused by the jews-only state. In summary when comparing the policies of the two countries, the jews-only state, in conjunction with its jewish allies in america, has transformed america into its own image whilst america has totally failed to civilize the racist state and bring it into the community of nations. Another blatant example of this zionization process is that for three decades american administrations failed to force the jews to sign up to the npt but now bush has now joined the jews’ in their opposition to this american inspired treaty. That jews have taken over much of america’s political system is transparent from the migration of policies from the jews-only state to america rather than the other way around.
The Jews’ trigger for War with Iran.
Historically, the jews-only state was unable to prevent iran from starting up a nuclear power industry. The more progress iran made on developing nuclear power facilities, the more belligerent the jews became. Once bush was elected, the jews-only state started threatening to launch a military attack on iran’s nuclear power facilities. It drew a line in the sand proposing to that military action might have to be taken if iran succeeded in running 3,000 gas centrifuges in its uranium enrichment plant. The jews argued this number of centrifuges would enable it to enrich uranium-235 beyond the 5% needed to fuel a nuclear power plant, to the 95% level needed for a nuclear weapon. If they could not diplomatically stop iran from reaching this number of centrifuges they might have to resort to military action. Thus the jews made this figure their "point of no return" i.e. their trigger for a pre-emptive and illegal attack on iran’s nuclear facilities. The jews have gained support for this policy from their quislings in the bush regime and in many other governments throughout the western world.
Whilst the jews-only state has been threatening to attack iran, america’s ruling jewish elite has been pressuring the bush regime into launching a proxy zionist war against iran. The jewish neocons have been frothing madly that the bush regime should embark on a third world war to break up middle eastern countries into mini-states that would never accumulate the resources to develop civil nuclear power let alone nuclear weapons. An attack on iran could easily escalate into a regional war. It could also escalate into the third world war being demanded by the poisonous jewish neocons. A new world war could result in the deaths of thousands of american troops and cause america and the west to suffer even greater economic and military calamities than they have because of their proxy zionist invasions of afghanistan and iraq. It could produce a global recession in which few people around the world would remain unscathed. The jews are pushing the world into a catastrophic third world war because of their warmongering paranoia over iran’s non-existent nuclear weapons.
IAEA Scientists state that 3,000 Centrifuges cannot make a Nuclear Bomb.
The specific allegation the jews are presenting to persuade the world of the necessity for a war against iran is that if iran succeeds in running 3,000 gas centrifuges for a year this would enable it to produce a nuclear bomb. "There is a civilian program, a secret weapons program, and Iran is expanding its ballistic missile power," Israeli Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz told reporters here on Nov. 8. Mofaz, who is serving as Jerusalem's lead negotiator in the U.S.-Israel strategic dialogue, said the need to isolate Iran had increased urgency. He pointed to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's announcement that his country is now operating 3,000 centrifuges, the number required to enrich bomb-grade uranium." (Ron Kampeas ‘Israel, U.S. Jews intensify efforts to isolate Iran’ http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/news/article/20071111heinleinmofaz.html November 11, 2007). This accusation is a lie. It is not possible for 3,000 gas centrifuges to enrich uranium to such a degree as to produce a fissile nuclear weapon. The international atomic energy agency believes there is no scientific basis to the jews’ allegation.
September 08, 2007.
"But ElBaradei observed in an interview with The Financial Times on February 19 that even if Iran had 3,000 or more centrifuges operating, they could not go beyond 5% enrichment, which would be far below what would be required for weapons-grade uranium, as long they remain under an IAEA inspection regime." (Gareth Porter ‘Iran spinning centrifuges - and half-truths’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II08Ak02.html September 08, 2007).
October 01, 2007.
"A diplomat in Vienna, where the I.A.E.A. is based, said, "The Iranians are years away from making a bomb, as ElBaradei has said all along. Running three thousand centrifuges does not make a bomb."" (Seymour M. Hersh ‘Shifting Targets: The Administration’s plan for Iran’ http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/10/08/071008fa_fact_hersh October 01, 2007).
The Jews hyping up Iran’s Nuclear Threat.
The jews are hyping up iran’s nuclear threat by accusing it of being on the verge of acquiring a ‘nuclear weapon’. They are trying to deceive the western world into believing iran is close to creating a fissile nuclear bomb producing the characteristic mushroom cloud whereas the most iran could create would be a ‘dirty bomb’ or ‘suitcase bomb’. Iran could use the 5% enriched uranium for its nuclear power station to contaminate a conventional bomb. "An Israeli official said, "Our main focus has been the Iranian nuclear facilities, not because other things aren’t important. We’ve worked on missile technology and terrorism, but we see the Iranian nuclear issue as one that cuts across everything." Iran, he added, does not need to develop an actual warhead to be a threat. "Our problems begin when they learn and master the nuclear fuel cycle and when they have the nuclear materials," he said. There was, for example, the possibility of a "dirty bomb," or of Iran’s passing materials to terrorist groups." (Seymour M. Hersh ‘Shifting Targets: The Administration’s plan for Iran’ http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/10/08/071008fa_fact_hersh October 01, 2007).
The effectiveness of the jews’ propaganda against iran is that a dirty bomb is commonly regarded with as much fear as a fissile nuclear weapon. In reality it is only marginally more destructive than the same conventional bomb without the nuclear contaminants but is nothing like as awesomely destructive as a fissile nuclear bomb. The western public regards a dirty bomb with great fear primarily because it has an irrational fear of the dangers posed by nuclear radiation. The numbers of people who would be killed by radiation scattered from a dirty bomb would be smaller than those killed by the conventional explosives alone, but such a bomb induces psychological terror because of common fears about the lethality of nuclear radiation. Indeed, any country around the world has the potential to create a dirty bomb. All they would need to do is buy up a couple of thousand cheap watches with luminous dials and then pad the dials around some conventional explosives and hey presto a ‘nuclear bomb’. Iran would not benefit militarily from acquiring dirty bombs. They would not increase iran’s military threat.
The jews are trying to win popular support in the west for an attack on iran on the pretext that they have to defend themselves from an iranian nuclear weapon. A lot of people in the west would accept this justification not simply because they are islamophobic but because they acknowledge that countries have a right to defend themselves from a military attack. But the jews are misleading such sympathizers. They are pretending iran is close to getting a fissile nuclear bomb when in fact the most it could achieve would be a measly dirty bomb using uranium enriched to 5% for civil nuclear power stations. If people support the jews’ rationale for military action they are in effect condoning an attack on iran merely for acquiring civil nuclear power.
The jews are perpetuating a hoax that iran is on the verge of creating a ‘nuclear bomb’ when what they really mean, but very rarely state in public, is just a mere ‘dirty bomb’. This is even more of a deception given that iranian leaders have repeatedly stated they do not want to acquire nuclear weapons because they believe such weapons are un-islamic.
The Jews trying to dupe the Bush regime and the American public with their 3,000 Centrifuge Mumbo Jumbo.
The jews-only state alleges iran could produce a fissile nuclear bomb from running 3,000 centrifuges but it cannot provide the scientific proof for this allegation. Such proof is even more imperative given that a war against iran could cause a global catastrophe. Surely, if the jews are to attack iran causing the outbreak of a third world war then their scientific evidence should be beyond doubt. But they have no such evidence. They cannot provide any scientific evidence to support their paranoid allegation. As a consequence, just as the jews pushed the bush regime and the american public into an invasion of iraq to destroy saddam’s non-existent nuclear weapons, so they are doing exactly the same as regards iran’s non-existent nuclear weapons.
The bush regime has implied that if iran suspends its nuclear enrichment programme then it will talk to iran’s president, whom it has depicted as adolf hitler, about all the outstanding issues between the two countries. However, just as was the case with saddam, if iran complies with this ultimatum then the bush regime will then insist on iran meeting a string of other demands before negotiations take place. For example, that iran should dismantle its nuclear facilities before discussions start. Iran has no option other than to proceed with what it is doing.
Iran’s right to develop Nuclear Power is being blocked by the Jews’ fear of a Dirty Bomb.
Iran has sought to placate the west’s concerns over its development of nuclear power by proposing to restrict the number of centrifuges in its nuclear enrichment plant solely to that required to enrich uranium to the level of 5% needed to fuel a nuclear power station. It is willing to accept monitoring systems and inspections so that it could not go beyond the installation of 3,000 centrifuges without triggering immediate attention to what it was doing. (Even if iran suddenly decided to increase the number of centrifuges, it would require a significant leap in its technological expertise to be able to produce 95% enriched uranium for a fissile nuclear bomb. This would provide the world with ample time to present iran with an ultimatum). This compromise should make both sides happy. Iran would be able to fuel its nuclear power stations and the west would not have to fear iran developing fissile nuclear bombs.
The west, however, has refused to accept this sensible and entirely reasonable compromise. It wants iran to stop all enrichment and abandon its dreams of civil nuclear power. It is willing to abrogate iran’s rights under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty to develop a nuclear power industry. The jews are paranoid that iran might either use 5% enriched uranium to provide itself with a militarily useless dirty bomb or that it could increase the number of centrifuges to produce 95% enriched uranium for a fissile nuclear bomb so quickly that the world would not have time to stop this from happening. "In the brief 2005 negotiations with the European Union Three (EU-3: Britain, France and Germany), Iran submitted a formal proposal offering to negotiate a mutually acceptable ceiling on the number of centrifuges at Natanz, which would be producing low-enriched uranium that could not be used to make weapons, and "continuous on-site" inspection by IAEA nuclear specialists at all facilities to provide "unprecedented added guarantees". The EU-3 refused to discuss the proposal with Tehran." (Gareth Porter ‘Iran spinning centrifuges - and half-truths’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II08Ak02.html September 08, 2007).
Ahmadinejad declares Iran has 3,000 working centrifuges.
Ahmadinejad’s Announcement - November 07, 2007.
At the beginning of november 2007, the nuclear stand-off between the jews-only state and iran reached a critical turning point when mahmoud ahmadinejad announced iran had succeeded in running 3,000 centrifuges in its nuclear enrichment plant. "Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's announcement Wednesday that Iran had 3,000 working centrifuges raised fears in Washington that Israel would respond to the statement with a preemptive military strike, the Times reported Thursday. Ahmadinejad announced that Iran has achieved a landmark, with 3,000 centrifuges fully operational in its uranium enrichment program. "We have now reached 3,000 machines," Ahmadinejad told thousands of Iranians gathered in Birjand, eastern Iran, in a show of defiance of international demands to halt the program believed to be masking the country's nuclear arms efforts. Ahmadinejad has previously said Iran had succeeded in installing the 3,000 centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility at Natanz. But Wednesday's claim was his first official statement that the plant is now operating all those centrifuges. When Iran first announced launching the 3,000 centrifuges in April, the UN nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Teheran had only 328 centrifuges up and running at Natanz's underground facility. In a recent report, drawn up by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, the agency put the number of centrifuges working in Natanz at close to 2,000, with another 650 being tested. Although Ahmadinejad was not totally precise, the tone and setting of his Wednesday speech reflected he clearly meant the 3,000 were fully operational." (Yaakov Katz and Mark Weiss ‘'US afraid of an Israeli strike following Iranian announcement' http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380761787&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull November 08, 2007).
Jews declare Ahmadinejad is Lying - November 08, 2007.
The jews’ immediately dismissed ahmadinejad’s announcement. Having drawn their line in the sand at 3,000 centrifuges, the jews seemed to believe such an announcement was just a political ploy to deflate criticisms before iran achieved this figure for real. "Israeli officials said they did not believe Ahmadinejad's claims about the 3,000 centrifuges. Jerusalem believes the Iranian president is lying in an effort to create the impression that Teheran already has a nuclear bomb and has passed the point of no return. Teheran hopes that this will deter international resolve for tougher sanctions, according to this view. But according to the Israeli officials, not only does Israel not believe Ahmadinejad, the international community has also not been fooled." (Yaakov Katz, Mark Weiss ‘'US afraid of an Israeli strike following Iranian announcement' http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380761787&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull November 08, 2007).
IAEA’s Report confirms Iran is Running 3,000 Centrifuges - November 15, 2007.
However, a week later the iaea released its latest report on its intense monitoring of iran’s nuclear facilities and stated that iran was indeed running 3,000 centrifuges thereby confirming the veracity of ahmadinejad’s statement. "A senior UN official confirmed a claim by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that Iran had reached a key target of 3,000 centrifuges enriching uranium." (Olivier Knox ‘US talks tough over Iran, warns China’ http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071115/pl_afp/usirannuclearunchina_071115213315 November 15, 2007); "What ElBaradei "verified" was that Iran had finished installing eighteen 164-machine cascades and that uranium-hexafluoride had been fed into all 18 cascades. ElBaradei also reported that the "feed rate" as well as the enrichment level, both of which the IAEA "audits", have remained low." (Gordon Prather ‘IAEA Again Verifies Iranian Compliance’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11923 November 17, 2007).
The Jewish Conspiracy to spread the Lie that running 3,000 Centrifuges for a year could create a Fissile Nuclear Bomb.
A Jewish Conspiracy to deceive the World into initiating World War Three.
The jews have no scientific evidence to back up their scandalous allegation that iran’s 3,000 centrifuges could enrich uranium for a fissile nuclear bomb. The world’s leading experts on nuclear power have insisted this is not feasible especially given the primitive machines being used by iran. The jews have no scientific evidence but they do have the political and media power to spread their lie around the western world and present it as scientific fact. Below is a list of the journalists who have repeated the jews-only state’s lie in america’s mainstream media. It seems plausible to suspect that these so-called journalists have been briefed either by the likudniks in the bush regime or by the jews-only lobby to reiterate the same lie. And it also has to be suspected they have been complicit in publicizing this lie by giving the jews’ allegation the flimsiest degree of scientific credibility by referring to ineffable "scientists" or "US experts". None of these journalists has verified their stories by quoting the opinions of a respected, named, nuclear scientist.
Ian Bruce.
"Although intelligence estimates vary as to when Iran will achieve the know-how for a bomb, the French government recently received a memo from the International Atomic Energy Agency stating that Iran will be ready to run almost 3000 centrifuges in 18 cascades by the end of this month. That is in defiance of a UN ban on uranium enrichment and would be enough to produce a nuclear weapon within a year." (Ian Bruce ‘Secret move to upgrade air base for Iran attack plans’ http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/foreign/display.var.1792035.0.0.php October 29 2007).
Yaakov Katz and Mark Weiss.
"Uranium gas, spun in linked centrifuges, can result in either low-enriched fuel suitable to generate power in a nuclear reactor, or the weapons-grade material that forms the fissile core of nuclear warheads. US experts say 3,000 centrifuges are enough to produce a nuclear weapon, perhaps as soon as within a year." (Yaakov Katz and Mark Weiss ‘'US afraid of an Israeli strike following Iranian announcement' http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380761787&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull November 08, 2007).
Tom Baldwin, James Hider, and Francis Elliott.
"US experts say 3,000 machines running for long periods could make enough enriched uranium for an atomic bomb within a year." (Tom Baldwin, James Hider, and Francis Elliott ‘US fears Israeli strike against Iran over latest nuclear claim’ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2827787.ece November 8, 2007). These journos not only refer to the ubiquitous but delphic us experts, they use a rather imprecise formulation: 3,000 machines "running for long periods of time". Apparently however not longer than a year.
Olivier Knox.
"Scientists say that number (3,000 centrifuges) could be sufficient to produce enough enriched uranium in one year to make a single nuclear bomb." (Olivier Knox ‘US talks tough over Iran, warns China’ http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071115/pl_afp/usirannuclearunchina_071115213315 November 15, 2007).
Maggie Farley.
"Last week, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that a cascade of 3,000 centrifuges was operating and the country's nuclear program was "irreversible." If the cascade is functioning properly, at that rate the Iranians could enrich enough uranium for a bomb in about a year, scientists say, though U.S. intelligence estimates put Tehran between four and seven years away from constructing a complete weapon." (Maggie Farley ‘Iran reveals how it built nuclear program, U.N. says’ http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fairenough/latimesD27.html November 15, 2007).
Farley inadvertently and unintentionally contradicted herself when trying to provide the jews’ allegation with a degree of scientific credibility. She mentioned american intelligence estimates that iran is 4-7 years away from creating a bomb. But surely if america’s intelligence services knew scientifically that iran could create a fissile nuclear bomb within a year using 3000 centrifuges then it wouldn’t be arguing iran was 4-7 year away from creating a bomb. This blatant contradiction adds to the suspicion this journalist, like many others, took her cue from likudniks in the bush regime or the jewish lobby rather than from nuclear scientists.
Elaine Sciolino and William J. Broad.
"In the report, the agency confirmed for the first time that Iran had reached the major milestone of 3,000 operating centrifuges, a tenfold increase from just a year ago. In theory, that means that it could produce enough uranium to make a nuclear weapon within a year to 18 months. The report could also fuel debate about how much time is left for diplomacy to succeed. The confirmation that Iran has 3,000 operational centrifuges suggests that it is quickly moving to a position where it could, if it wanted to, produce a bomb. Iran has denied that it seeks a nuclear weapon." (Elaine Sciolino and William J. Broad ‘Report Raises New Doubts on Iran Nuclear Program’ http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/16/world/middleeast/16nuke.html?ex=1352869200&en=82d491ab9329016a&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss November 16, 2007).
Gordon prather produced a critique of this new york times article. He feigns bewilderment as to who put forward the proposition that 3,000 centrifuges could create nuclear weapons. "What neo-crazy crackpot told gullible [or complicit?] New York Times' reporters that gas centrifuges could produce uranium at all, much less produce weapons-grade almost pure Uranium-235? Uranium-enrichment plants don't "produce" uranium, they "cast out" the Uranium-238 istopes from the uranium-hexafluoride fed them." (Gordon Prather ‘IAEA Again Verifies Iranian Compliance’ http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=11923 November 17, 2007).
Robin Wright, Peter Baker and Michael Abramowitz.
"This week's report by the IAEA confirmed that Iran has reached the technical milestone of 3,000 centrifuges, which could produce enough highly enriched uranium to make a nuclear weapon in a year, if all are working. Many experts believe Iran is still facing technical difficulties with its centrifuges, however." (Robin Wright. Staff writers Peter Baker and Michael Abramowitz contributed to this report. ‘Deepening China-Iran Ties Weaken Bid to Isolate Iran’ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/17/AR2007111701680_pf.html November 18, 2007).
Matthew Schofield.
"In fact, Iran has expanded its enrichment program, reaching a so-called "magic number" of 3,000 working centrifuges, which most experts believe could produce enough highly enriched uranium in one year to make a nuclear weapon. Enriched uranium is used for research and energy generation, as well as for weapons. Weapons grade uranium is enriched to 90 percent U-235, while electric power plants are fueled by uranium enriched to less than 5 percent. The enrichment equipment and the process to create both are similar. As one nuclear inspector summed up: "You just spin it longer to highly enrich."" (Matthew Schofield ‘As U.S. presses for more sanctions, nations remain divided on Iran’ http://www.mcclatchydc.com/243/story/21650.html November 18, 2007).
Conclusions
It has been noted. "News media have routinely repeated the statement that 3,000 centrifuges could enrich enough uranium to make a bomb, provided the machines run for the requisite periods." (Gareth Porter ‘Iran spinning centrifuges - and half-truths’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II08Ak02.html September 08, 2007). But, it is surely more than just a bizarre coincidence that most of america’s mainstream journalists plugged the jews-only state’s lie about iran’s capability for producing nuclear weapons and sought to give credence to such a lie by citing unnamed scientists/experts. The reason for this unanimity is that america’s mainstream media is controlled by zionists who are willing to contribute to the jewish conspiracy to demonize iran.
The zionist dominated american media publicized the alleged critical importance of the 3,000 centrifuge figure not merely because it provided the jews-only state with a justification for military action but because it provided bush with favourable publicity should he decide to attack iran.
It has been surprising to discover that one of america’s few commentators who seemed capable of detecting the hidden hand of the jews-only lobby has ended up peddling one of its most prominent lies. "We are not out of the woods yet. If Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is telling the truth about those 3,000 centrifuges working perfectly, Iran could have the nuclear material for a single bomb in a year." (Patrick J. Buchanan ‘Is World War III on Hold?’ http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=11899 November 13, 2007).
Ahmadinejad’s Nuclear Policy under dispute in Iran.
There is another ruse used by the zionist dominated western media to add credibility to the notion that iran is on the verge of creating a fissile nuclear weapon.
After ahmadinejad’s statement that iran had linked up 3,000 centrifuges, the western media suddenly started reporting increased levels of criticisms in iran against ahmadinejad’s nuclear policy. "During more than two years as Iranian president, Mahmud Ahmadinejad has made his share of provocative statements. In October 2005, he famously cast doubt on the Holocaust. And in New York in September, he claimed that no homosexuals lived in Iran. But until this week, the hardline president had never publicly called his own internal critics "traitors", including those from his own conservative party in the government of the Islamic Republic. Ahmadinejad, in a speech this week at Tehran's Science and Technology University, denounced what he called "traitors" to Iran's nuclear program. He threatened to name and shame these critics unless they ended pressure to change Iran's nuclear policy. The harshness of his attack points to a serious rift within the establishment about how Ahmadinejad's hard line is driving Iran into international isolation." (Breffni O'Rourke ‘Iran gets tough on nuclear 'traitors'’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IK16Ak02.html November 16, 2007). The implication being that ahmadinejad’s critics were becoming more vocal because they also believed the 3,000 centrifuge figure was the critical point for creating a fissile nuclear weapon – thus reinforcing the correctness of the jews’ fabrication.
O'rourke also adds credence to the jews’ fabrication by implying that china had felt it necessary to turn against ahmadinejad now that iran is close to acquiring a fissile nuclear bomb. "And he (Hassan Rohani, head of Khatami's nuclear negotiating team).criticized what he called the failure of Iranian diplomacy on the nuclear issue, saying that to succeed in diplomacy means preventing enemies from becoming allies with other countries - an apparent reference to recent moves by Germany, France and even China to more directly confront Iran over its nuclear program." (Breffni O'Rourke ‘Iran gets tough on nuclear 'traitors'’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IK16Ak02.html November 16, 2007).
It was simply not true, however, that china has shifted away from iran. On the contrary, it welcomed iran’s cooperation with the iaea and seems to be even more willing to block a third round of sanctions on iran. "As long as the process moves a bit forward, we should keep on this track," a Chinese diplomat said. "The main thing for the Security Council is to help the IAEA answer these outstanding questions, and we are not convinced that additional sanctions would help." (Maggie Farley ‘Iran reveals how it built nuclear program, U.N. says’ http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fairenough/latimesD27.html November 15, 2007).
Russia has also signaled its opposition to a third round of security council sanctions. Firstly, by stating it is prepared to complete the bushehr nuclear reactor. "Russian President Vladimir Putin recently vowed that his country would complete the construction of Iran's first nuclear power station on time and on Nov. 26 begin preparing to deliver low-enriched nuclear fuel to Iran. The head of Russia's Atomic Energy Agency, Sergei Kiriyenko, recently said that Iran's new nuclear reactor "creates no risks for nuclear weapons proliferation."" (Matthew Schofield ‘As U.S. presses for more sanctions, nations remain divided on Iran’ http://www.mcclatchydc.com/243/story/21650.html November 18, 2007).
Secondly, by voting to abandon a peace treaty between the two former superpowers it seems to be growing increasingly impatient with the wild accusations being leveled against iran. "The Russian senate voted Friday to suspend compliance with a key Cold War treaty limiting conventional military forces across Europe, drawing renewed Western criticism. The treaty's demise highlights deteriorating relations between Moscow and countries of the Atlantic alliance as Putin's administration pushes to reassert Russia on the international stage." (Nick Coleman ‘Russia abandons key Cold War arms treaty’ http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071116/wl_afp/russianatomilitarytreatycfe5thleadwrap;_ylt=Ag9Uj_s_l1FWjHThGnZjl8Cs0NUE November 16, 2007).
The Pieces are falling in place for an attack on Iran.
Over the last few years the jews-only state has proposed the figure of 3000 centrifuges as a trigger for an attack on iran to stop its alleged development of a fissile nuclear weapon. Iran has now reached this figure so an attack seems more feasible. But, not necessarily an imminent attack. The jews will likely wait to see if the security council imposes a third round of sanctions on iran. It is likely they will also wait for a report to be published at the end of november 2007 by the european union's foreign-policy chief, javier solana to see if europe comes up with some effective sanctions against iran. If there are no further sanctions from either the security council or the european union then the jews may well feel they have reached the end of their diplomatic options. A number of leading jews stated earlier this year that the jews-only state should give the world until the end of 2007 to solve the problem diplomatically. If this did not happen it should consider the military option.
The last hurdle for the jews to face would be to try and manipulate america into attacking iran. If they cannot do so they will be left to act themselves - even though once iran retaliates america will become involved. "A claim by President Ahmadinejad that Iran has 3,000 working uranium-enriching centrifuges sent a tremor across the world yesterday amid fears that Israel would respond by bombing the country’s nuclear facilities. Military sources in Washington said that the existence of such a large number could be a "tipping point", triggering an Israeli air strike. The Pentagon is reluctant to take military action against Iran, but officials say that Israel is a "different matter". Amid the international uproar, British MPs who were to have toured the nuclear facility were backing out of their Iran trip. Even before President Ahmadinejad’s announcement, a US defence official told The Times yesterday: "Israel could do something when they get to around 3,000 working centrifuges. The Pentagon is minded to wait a little longer."" (Tom Baldwin, James Hider, and Francis Elliott ‘US fears Israeli strike against Iran over latest nuclear claim’ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2827787.ece November 8, 2007).
Are the Jews really willing to sacrifice America and the World in order to attack Iran?
The article quoted in the previous paragraph was published in rupert murdoch’s timesonline and suggested the bush regime fears the jews-only state will attack iran. There is no mention that if the jews do launch such an attack then they will put hundreds of thousands of american troops in harms way. If iran retaliates against a jewish attack it could lead to the deaths of thousands of american troops. In effect, the jews would be responsible for killing thousands of american troops.
The jews-only state, and america’s jewish ruling elite, pushed america into proxy zionist invasions of afghanistan and iraq. They believed the invasions would be a cakewalk and that the costs of the wars would be funded by increased iraqi oil exports. These invasions have turned out to be a calamity for both afghanistan and iraq. They have been an economic, political, and military, disaster for america. But they have also been a huge boost to jewish supremacism in the middle east. A war against iran is likely to exacerbate these diverging trends. It would be a catastrophe for american lives, treasure, and reputation, whilst further consolidating jewish supremacism in the middle east. It would become impossible to avoid the conclusion that the jews pushed america into these invasions to benefit the jews-only state at america’s expense.
Jewish commentators and jewish think tanks have invented, elaborated upon, and promoted, the idea of a third world war. The zionist dominated media has gone out of its way to publicize, encourage, and legitimize, such warmongering. If it became common knowledge that jewish commentators, the jewish lobby, and the zionist dominated media were responsible for the catastrophes in america and the west it is possible that public opinion would turn against them. It cannot be expected that those who most fervently advocated world war three should not be punished for any calamity which might ensue. Jewish neocons and the jewish lobby were responsible for pushing america into the disaster it suffered in iraq. It was the failure of american politicians/media to punish those who advocated this war that enabled these paranoid warmongers to advocate yet another war. Surely pushing the world into a third world war should be regarded as a war crime and those convicted should be duly punished? Those initiating the third world war should be punished in exactly the same way as those who pushed the world into the second world war.
It would be the height of political absurdity to suggest that these criticisms of jewish warmongers should not be made because they might constitute anti-semitism. Accusations of anti-semitism simply pale in comparison to the war crimes committed by those provoking a third world war. Allegations of anti-semitism should not be allowed to cover up the war crimes being committed by jewish racists. A world in which jewish racists can get away with denouncing anti-racists as anti-semites in order to cover up their responsibility for a third world war, is a world being run by jewish nazis. The jewish neocons are as barbaric and warmongering as their nazi counterparts.
Labels: 000 centrifuges not enough to create a Nuclear Bomb, 3, America's Threat to attack Iran, Iran's non-existent nuclear weapons programme, Jewish Neocons pushing America into war against Iran
posted by The Mundi Club at 6:03 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home