The Jews condemning British withdrawal from Iraq

The invasions of afghanistan and iraq have been a huge political, military, and economic, disaster for america and britain whilst being a significant benefit to the jews-only state in palestine. Not surprisingly then the jews-only state wants britain and america to maintain their occupations of these countries even though this means they will continue to suffer calamitous losses in lives, resources, and reputation. It thus has to be asked whether the jewish commentators/politicians/lobbyists in america and britain who support these occupations are promoting the interests of the countries in which they live or the jews-only state? If the latter they are traitors to the countries in which they were raised.

David Wurmser.
David wurmser recently resigned after four years as vice president dick cheney's middle east adviser. "Mr Wurmser, an outspoken proponent of removing Saddam Hussein in the years before the 2003 invasion, was highly critical of British forces in southern Iraq. "Being in Basra, the British had a major role to play and they didn't really play it very well. "Under British presence, the Iranians extended their power considerably. British troops are still there but Iraqis see them as dead men walking.... everybody's looking towards who is the real power that fills the vacuum and that then translates into an Iranian-American confrontation in that area." British withdrawal, he said, could be a plus for the US. "It frees our hand to deal aggressively with their [Iran's] structures. Once we have responsibility for that area, we'll have to do what we need to do and that could well mean troops on the ground."" (Toby Harnden ‘US 'must break Iran and Syria regimes'’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/05/wiran105.xml October 05, 2007).