The Global Handwringers over the Jewish Nazis’ Maelstrom in Gaza

The biggest single handwringer over the jewish nazis’ maelstrom over gaza, the efforts to make gaza uninhabitable and the massacre of unarmed, innocent palestinians, was john kerry who at the end of july created the impression of working assiduously to foster a peace agreement between the palestinians and what netanyahu refers to as “the one and only-jewish state”. Only this magnanimous act of compassion isn’t quite what it seems.

Firstly, and most importantly, the so called peace agreement he proffered on friday august 01, 2014 wasn’t a peace agreement at all since it allowed the jews-only state to continue with their military operations inside gaza to remove hamas’s network of tunnels. Under the peace agreement these operations were deemed to be purely defensive in nature but not surprisingly hamas couldn’t see the difference between defensive military actions and the continued carnage of palestinians. “In announcing the brief ceasefire, Kerry said its terms authorized Israeli forces to carry out “defensive” operations against tunnels. He seemed unaware of the ramifications of such an agreement, or what Israel’s attacks on tunnels actually entailed. A glimpse at Human Rights Watch’s bracing report on the Israeli army’s brutal assault on Rafah in 2004, “Razing Rafah,” which it conducted under the auspices of anti-tunnel operations, would have offered a glimpse of what was to come. (American activist Rachel Corrie was killed by an Israeli bulldozer during the 2004 attack on Rafah).” (Max Blumenthal and Allison Deger ‘Who broke the ceasefire? Obama blames Hamas against the evidence’ http://mondoweiss.net/2014/08/ceasefire-against-evidence.html August 2, 2014).[i]

Secondly, kerry wanted the negotiations to take place not in turkey or qatar but egypt. President sisi has a vehement hatred of hamas and has been pursuing the blockade of gaza with as much gusto as the racist state so any members of hamas in the palestinian delegation would have had to be concerned about being terminated by a member of egypt’s murderous military junta who’d spent too much time in their country’s prisons torturing thousands of innocent supporters of the moslem brotherhood.

Thirdly, “On July 31, 2014, Mr. Brian Wood, Head of Arms Control and Human Rights at Amnesty International, (stated) that, “It is deeply cynical for the White House to condemn the deaths and injuries of Palestinians, including children, and humanitarian workers, when it knows full well that the Israeli military responsible for such attacks are armed to the teeth with weapons and equipment bankrolled by US taxpayers.” (Quoted in Franklin Lamb ‘(A Nail in Zionism’s Coffin?’ http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/08/01/a-nail-in-zionisms-coffin/ August 1-3, 2014).

There were, however, no traces of handwringing in the american congress that voted unanimously to support the jewish maelstrom over gaza. Members of congress, funded and groomed by the jewish lobby, gave total support to what the jews-only state calls its right to defend itself. But no impartial witness to the scenes of devastation in gaza could possibly believe this was anything other than a full scale, belligerent military offensive. “Meanwhile, U.S. politicians and policymakers continue to back a brutal military campaign whose primary purpose is not to defend Israel but rather to protect its longstanding effort to colonize the West Bank.” (Stephen M. Walt ‘AIPAC Is the Only Explanation for America's Morally Bankrupt Israel Policy’ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-m-walt/aipac-americas-israel-policy_b_5607883.html?utm_hp_ref=tw July 22, 2014). However, this latest military offensive seemed to be about more than the continued colonization of the west bank. The jewish nazis claimed to be using precision guided weapons to take out specific targets such as hamas fighters, rocket launching sites, and so-called terror tunnels and yet they have also been flattening whole neighbourhoods in order to create a three mile buffer zone inside gaza. The jews-only state has in effect stolen 40% of gaza’s land area in what can only be called another act of lebensraum in the long historical process of jewish colonialism whose ultimate goal is the creation of greater israel. The jews are literally pushing gazans towards the beaches of the mediterranean.

In Britain, the conservative government, just like the jewish quislings in the american congress, stood shoulder to shoulder with benyamin netanyahu. On a recent visit to the apartheid state phillip hammond, the newly appointed foreign secretary, stood on the podia alongside netanyahu regurgitating the likudniks’ war propaganda basically indicating he would raise no objections to whatever scale of military offensive netanyahu chose to carry out in gaza. Hammond wasn’t going to ruffle the feathers of the conservative party’s jewish neocon/zionist/likudnik funders and its massed ranks of fanatical zionist supporters – virtually every single conservative member of parliament is also a member of conservative friends of the jewish apartheid state. The tory government’s line on the massacre has been “a willingness to describe the deaths of Palestinians as horrifying or appalling. They have refused, however, to describe the toll as disproportionate, and Cameron has continued to argue that Hamas is primarily responsible, saying next to nothing about the long-term situation in Gaza. Those who accompanied the prime minister to the Middle East were struck by his unequivocal support for Israel in his speech to the Knesset, promising to be with the country "every step of the way".” (Patrick Wintour ‘Lady Warsi's symbolic status may prove crucial loss for Tories’ http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/05/lady-warsi-symbolic-status-tories-resignation-gaza August 05, 2014).

Cameron envisages the jews-only state as a western style open, liberal, democratic state which deserves close political ties to the european union and nato. From this perspective there is nothing morally reprehensible about the nazi members of netanyahu’s government, the apartheid nature of the jews-only state, the zionist military occupation of the west bank, the seven year siege of gaza, nor the jews-only state’s continual theft of palestinian land. Thus the apartheid state was right to defend itself by attacking and invading gaza; it did not use disproportionate violence; it committed no war crimes; and hamas is responsible for killing its own people. There is, therefore, no reason to stop selling the weapons the jews-only state needs to slaughter innocent people and palestinians have to be stopped from submitting their claim for justice to the international criminal court.

The government’s supposed review of weapons’ sales to the racist state is just a sop to public anger over the attack on gaza which will quietly be dropped once the issue gets pushed down the political agenda. “Britain is reviewing all arms export licenses to Israel in response to the Jewish state's escalating conflict with Hamas in Gaza, a government spokeswoman said on Monday. "We are currently reviewing all export licenses to Israel to confirm that we think they are appropriate," a spokeswoman for Prime Minister David Cameron told reporters. The decision to conduct the review was taken last week, she said.” (Britain says reviewing arms exports to Israel over Gaza conflict’ http://news.yahoo.com/britain-says-reviewing-arms-exports-israel-over-gaza-113559410--business.html August 4, 2014).[ii]

The only tory member of the cabinet who resigned over the government’s obsequiousness to the apartheid state was sayeeda warsi, a senior foreign office minister dealing with the united nations. “Sayeeda Warsi, a senior minister in Britain's Foreign Office, resigned on Tuesday, accusing Prime Minister David Cameron's government of taking a "morally indefensible" approach to the conflict between Israel and Hamas. "Our approach and language during the current crisis in Gaza is morally indefensible, is not in Britain's national interest and will have a long term detrimental impact on our reputation internationally and domestically," Warsi, 43, said.” (William James and Kylie MacLellan ‘UK minister quits over 'morally indefensible' Gaza policy’ http://news.yahoo.com/uk-minister-sayeeda-warsi-says-resigns-over-government-083711423--business.html August 05, 2014).

Warsi did not resign quietly but highlighted some aspects of the conservative government’s slavish devotion to the jews-only state. “Lady Warsi revealed that senior foreign office officials and ministers were overruled by David Cameron who decided that the Government would not take a stronger line on Israel's incursion into Gaza. She suggested that senior Tory figures may have been overly influenced by pro-Israeli lobbying groups such as Conservative Friends of Israel. "What does concern me is that when you have senior officials and you have ministers within the Foreign Office saying we are in the wrong place on this policy, yet somehow that view is not being reflected. I certainly don't think the decisions were being made in the Foreign Office." She went on to say: "One of the advantages we have in the Conservative Party is that the relationships between the Israeli government and the leadership of the Conservative Party is incredibly close. People like George Osborne and Michael Gove are very, very close to the Israeli leadership. What is the point of having that relationship if you can't use it to move them to a position which is in their interest and our interest?" Asked if she believed that the amount of funding from wealthy pro-Israeli donors might have influenced the Government's stance on Gaza, she replied: "I hope that how the Conservative Party raises its funds does not have an impact in relation to its policy in Government. The national interest should never be subject to the chequebooks of anybody."” (Oliver Wright ‘Baroness Warsi turns on 'public school' Tories’ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/baroness-warsi-turns-on-public-school-tories-9659495.html August 10, 2014).

Warsi hit back at chancellor george osborne who refused to depict the jewish slaughter of palestinians as being disproportionate and criticized her resignation for being unnecessary. “She said: "George is a very good friend of the Israeli government and therefore he, more than anybody else, should have been saying quite frankly to the Israeli government that what you are doing is not in your interest. This is probably the biggest single act of self-harm that the Israeli government has done over the last few years. What he should have been saying to the Israeli government is that it is unnecessary for you to kill innocent civilians, to displace a quarter of the Gazan population, for you to flatten schools, hospitals and power supplies and water supplies to achieve your end. Had George done that, I agree with him that it would not have been necessary for me to resign."” (Rowena Mason and Patrick Wintour ‘Warsi hits back at Osborne: 'George is a good friend of the Israeli government' http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/05/lady-warsi-osborne-israel-gaza-conflict August 05, 2014). She knows full well that george isn’t going to go into the lions’ den to tell them that meat is bad for their health.

The most explosive of warsi’s attacks on the tory government was that by disregarding the views of millions of british people cameron was going to suffer defeat at next year’s general election. In effect what she was saying was that cameron would rather lose at the next general election than change its servile support for the racist state. Support for the racist state was more important than the views of a substantial minority of the british electorate. However, whilst the cameron government seemed incapable of appreciating the domestic political consequences of its indifference over the devastation of gaza, boris johnson could see the writing on the wall for his party. After years of speculation about his political ambitions he suddenly announced his decision to try and stand for parliament because he wanted to position himself as a leadership candidate after cameron’s electoral defeat at the next general election. If the tory government was being held hostage by its neocon funders then the party had to be rescued by a more populist leader who would take into account the views of the wider british public.

Whilst the tory government followed the lead of the american congress in giving wholehearted support to the jews-only state, many other mainstream british politicians followed in kerry’s wake and have been throwing their arms in the air in mock despair over the decimation of gaza whilst upholding the racist state’s transparent right to protect itself.

Ed miliband criticized cameron’s indifference to the jewish maelstrom inflicted on gaza. “He needs to break his silence and say that Israel’s actions have been unjustified and indefensible. He needs to show that he can be even-handed and, without fear or favour, argue for the long-term solution that we need to this tragic conflict.”” (Patrick Wintour and Rowena Mason ‘Lady Warsi resigns over UK’s ‘morally reprehensible’ stance on Gaza’ http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/05/lady-warsi-resigns-government-gaza-stance August 05, 2014). Miliband then proceeded to demonstrate what he meant by being “even-handed and, without fear or favour.” "David Cameron … is right to say that Hamas is an appalling, terrorist organisation. Its wholly unjustified rocket attacks on Israeli citizens, as well as the building of tunnels for terrorist purposes, show the organisation's murderous intent and practice towards Israel and its citizens.” (Mark Leftly ‘Israel-Gaza conflict: David Cameron is 'in the wrong' over Gaza, says Ed Miliband’ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/israelgaza-conflict-david-cameron-is-in-the-wrong-over-gaza-says-ed-miliband-9644670.html August 03, 2014). Miliband would never say the jews-only state is a terrorist state and that its serial massacres of palestinians over the last 55 years shows a murderous intent and practice towards palestine and its citizens.

In april 2014 miliband visited the apartheid state, met some of its leading jewish nazis and paid a visit to sderot in the front line of hamas’s rocket fire. Sderot used to be a palestinian village before jewish ethnic cleansers slaughtered many of the villagers and drove out the rest. They then completely rebuilt the village in their own likeness eradicating all traces of palestinian life. His visit to sderot was presented to an ignorant british public as an act of sympathy for its vulnerable inhabitants in order to win the jewish vote in britain but, to those who knew the history of jewish colonization of palestine, he was in effect legitimizing the zionists’ policy of ethnic cleansing. This expression of his solidarity with jewish nazism was fortunate because when, a few months later, the apartheid state started massacring palestinians in gaza, like shooting fish in a barrel, he didn’t have to reiterate his support for the jews-only state amongst media images of hundreds of palestinian corpses – denounced as “telegenically dead” by the ever humane benjamin netanyahu.[iii] Needless to say the labour leader’s visit to the jews-only state didn’t include a visit to gaza. “Miliband visited Sderot to meet people who are subject to rocket attacks from Gaza. Notice that several tweets ask why Miliband isn’t visiting people under occupation in Gaza.” (Philip Weiss ‘For Miliband, the road to 10 Downing Street runs through Jerusalem and Sderot’ http://mondoweiss.net/2014/04/miliband-through-jerusalem.html April 11, 2014). Thus the labour leader publicly opposes jewish settlements whilst standing in solidarity with them, “I do believe the growth in settlements is a serious issue for the peace process and needs to be addressed,” he said, adding that they were illegal under international law.” (Ed Miliband quoted in Philip Weiss ‘For Miliband, the road to 10 Downing Street runs through Jerusalem and Sderot’ http://mondoweiss.net/2014/04/miliband-through-jerusalem.html April 11, 2014).

Miliband is also opposed to a boycott of the racist state. “I think the boycotts of Israel are totally wrong," he said. "We should have no tolerance for boycotts. I would say that to any trade union leaders.” (Quoted in JTA ‘British Labor leader Miliband pledges to oppose Israel boycott’ http://www.jta.org/news/article/2013/03/08/3121551/british-labour-leader-miliband-pleadges-to-oppose-israel-boycott March 8, 2013). The author of this jta article describes miliband as, “the leader of the British opposition, who is Jewish ,,,” Does this mean the jta believes miliband is jewish rather than british seemingly implying he is loyal to the jews-only state rather than to britain? Miliband was born and raised in this country and yet the jta deems him to be jewish not british, let alone a british jew. Perhaps the jta believes his jewishness manifests itself in his views over the jewish colonization of palestine?

Nick clegg, leader of the liberal democrats and deputy prime minister in the coalition government, also sought to distance himself from cameron’s stance over gaza by stating “I believe it is right for Britain to be unambiguous in our condemnation of Hamas’s indiscriminate firing of rockets but also very forceful and outspoken about Israel. The bombing of three UN schools is a complete outrage.”” (Patrick Wintour and Rowena Mason ‘Lady Warsi resigns over UK’s ‘morally reprehensible’ stance on Gaza’ http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/05/lady-warsi-resigns-government-gaza-stance August 05, 2014). So here again we have the perverted moral inversion between “unambiguous condemnation of Hamas’s rockets” and “very forceful and outspoken about Israel” as if hamas was inflicting on jews what the racist state was doing to palestinians.

So, whilst most tories couldn’t even be bothered to indulge in any handwringing gesture over the jewish slaughter of palestinians, other prominent political leaders registered some minor protests over the slaughter in gaza whilst refusing to condemn the ongoing jewish colonization of palestine. No political leader in britain has denounced the incarceration of 1.8 million palestinians in the gazan open prison as a war crime.[iv] None have denounced the jewish nazis in the netanyahu government. None have denounced the jews-only state as a racist, apartheid state. They all support the jews-only state’s right to defend itself but refuse to support palestinians’ right to defend themselves. They all insist that palestinians must recognize the jewish state (“the one and only-jewish state”) whilst refusing to insist that jews must recognize palestinians’ right to a state (netanyahu’s cabinet is totally opposed to such a right). No matter how they try and pretend they are impartial over the palestinian issue their bigotry manifests itself through their refusal give palestinians the same rights as jews. They are in other words, facilitators of jewish racism. None of them are going to stop selling weapons to the racist state that will then be used to slaughter palestinians in pursuit of jewish colonial expansionism. Warsi has revealed the tories don’t even want the palestinians to get any justice for the expropriation of their land and property. “However, he (william hague) did not support a Palestinian appeal to the international criminal court.” (Editorial ‘The Guardian view on Lady Warsi’s resignation: a double whammy’ http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/05/guardian-view-lady-warsi-resignation August 05, 2014).

When the massed ranks of labour friends of israel, conservative friends of israel, and liberal democratic friends of israel, get together in the chambers of the house of commons the moral, and political distinctions between them vanish into thin air – with a few outstanding exceptions. It becomes a tea party of tweedledee, tweedledum and tweedlebollocks feasting on jewish supremacism whilst ignoring the consequences: the disproportionate number of zionist funders of the country’s three main political parties, the neocon domination of the british media, the apartheid nature of the jews-only state, the racist beliefs of netanyahu’s cabinet and continual jewish colonialism in palestine. It takes lots of shekels to buy such mass conformity amongst the country’s political and media elite. Many people in this country believe that politicians’ expenses’ row is over but it’s still ongoing in terms of party funding and politicians all expenses paid trips to the racist state.

Given that british political parties are so obsequious to american power and given that congress is so obsequious to the jews-only state (more accurately described as the american knesset) then in effect the british government is obsequious to the jews-only state and is perfectly happy selling weapons and ammunition to jewish nazis so that they can carry on slaughtering palestinians in pursuit of jewish expansionism. By selling weapons to the jews-only state, british politicians are just indulging in moral handwringing whenever they utter words of gentle criticism to their likudnik partners.

Whilst the jewish nazis were slaughtering unarmed palestinians, the british government was helping to boost islamophobia in the country by issuing a report written by a counter terrorist officer suggesting there was a radical islamic plot to take over schools in birmingham and that what was needed was to teach our kids some good old fashioned british values i.e. promoting military slaughters against innocent people in afghanistan, iraq, lebanon, libya and gaza and of course obsequiousness to the racist state. But this is not the end of such hypocrisy in british education. Whilst denouncing alleged islamic extremism, british politicians have been funding the establishment of schools run by christian fundamentalists teaching british kids that the bible, or more precisely the old testament, is infallible and that all science is a lie. But then british politicians, zionists to their core, are not bothered about such bigotry being taught in british schools because christian dispensationalists are implacable supporters of jewish colonialism.

British politicians and the media sustain their pro-zionist bigotry by promoting islamophobia. Thus people who go abroad to fight alongside moslem fundamentalists face prosecution on their return to britain whereas those who go to fight for the racist state face no such penalties. Jewish fundamentalists are a mirror image of moslem fundamentalsts. Thankfully this country has not yet seen the emergence of the jewish defence league who are jewish terrorists but they have existed in america and have recently started emerging in france. Does this country really want idf trained jewish terrorists taking the law into their own hands by targeting islamic fundamentalists thereby triggering off retaliatory actions?

Saudi arabia’s petro fascist, royal rulers have been the biggest handwringers over the carnage in gaza. Supposedly a friend of the palestinians they have detested hamas ever since it won palestinian national elections in 2006. They have done everything they could to undermine hamas’s democratic governance of gaza. King abdullah condemned the war in gaza as a "collective massacre" and a crime against humanity but blamed hamas for the carnage rather than the jews-only state. Golda meir once lamented she hated palestinians for forcing her military to slaughter palestinian children and, likewise, king abdullah condemned hamas for forcing the racist state to slaughter palestinians in gaza. “Unlike past Gaza wars, including the devastating 2008 offensive, the Saudi monarch did not condemn Israel outright for the conflict, which officials say has killed at least 1,500 Palestinians, mainly civilians, since it began on July 8. Israel says 63 of its soldiers and three civilians in Israel have been also killed. Abdullah warned that the fighting in Gaza will lead to a generation of children who will grow up knowing nothing but the language of violence. "We all see the blood of our brothers in Palestine bleeding out in collective massacres that do not spare anyone, and war crimes against humanity without humane or moral reservations," said the brief five-minute statement read on state TV.” (Abdullah Al-Shihri and Aya Batrawy ‘Saudi King Condemns Gaza War but Not Israel’ http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/saudi-king-gaza-war-crime-humanity-24803459?singlePage=true August 01, 2014).[v] The saudi elite had been financing the islamic state of syria and the levant to carry out gruesome, cold bloodied, mass murders in syria until it realized it had created a frankenstein monster that might eventually threaten its survival. The saudi government banned saudis who had gone to fight in syria from returning to their country so isil fighters had no option but to invade iraq and create their own state, the islamic state.

It has to be concluded about the handwringing of western and middle eastern political leaders over the maelstrom in gaza. “The stark reality is that Israel’s ‘continuing moral embattlement’ is an attribution only for those still possessing a morality gene and thus prone to outrage. Israel holds all the aces. It possesses near absolute power, for the reasons outlined above. None of the key pillars that underpin that power – nation states, national lobbies – have cracked under the escalating Gaza death count one iota. There have been no mea culpas amongst longtime supporters. The Hasbara is going full bore, with the mainstream media on tap and the foot soldiers flooding social media.” (Evan Jones ‘The Pariah State’ http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/08/01/the-pariah-state/ August 1-3, 2014).

In the face of this nazi like barbarity inflicted on gaza, let’s be honest about what is happening throughout the western world. The likudniks possess too much influence over western governments. The overwhelming military firepower that the jewish state brings to bear on palestinians is similar to the political firepower that the jewish state imposes on western governments through its likudnik lobbies. The jewish military’s pyrotechnics over gaza should be seen as a metaphor for the political pyrotechnics that likudnik lobbies are inflicting on western politicians and societies.

In america, “The US cannot serve as honest broker in Israel-Palestine negotiations because its government is overwhelming committed to and identified with Israel, including in this war. That is why President Obama keeps mouthing propaganda like that Israel has a right to defend itself (it doesn’t enjoy an absolute right of that sort– its defense has to be proportionate and within international law). The US political system is the most corrupt in the industrialized world, and our representatives have simply been bought and paid for by Israel fanatics like Sheldon Adelson or Haim Saban (the latter has also taken over Middle East analysis at Brookings, which used to have an independent editorial line). It is scary since the Likud took over, since it is just as though a Serbian Lobby in the 1990s had bribed Congress to support Slobodan Milosevic.” (Juan Cole ‘Top 5 Ways the US is Israel’s Accomplice in War Crimes in Gaza’ http://www.juancole.com/2014/08/israels-accomplice-crimes.html August 04, 2014). Evan jones puts it more bluntly, “Israel owns the U.S., lock stock and barrel. On 17 July, all 100 Senators voted for a resolution supporting Israel ‘as it defends itself against unprovoked (sic) rocket attacks’. Beyond abject servility, it is a treasonous and criminal act. Beyond the armaments flowing from the U.S. for the continuation of the slaughter, mendicant Israel continues to enjoy billions of dollars each year courtesy of the hapless U.S. taxpayer. Vocal Congressional critics of Israel (Cynthia McKinney, Paul Findley, etc.) lose office with the Lobby funding their opponents, providing a clear warning to any hopeful seeking office to purportedly represent (a quaint idea) the American public interest.” (Evan Jones ‘The Pariah State’ http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/08/01/the-pariah-state/ August 1-3, 2014). The british, canadian, and australian, political systems are no different.

Robert fisk provided an example of how netanyahu bullies france’s political leaders. “In France, there’s been derision at the way the government has reacted to Gaza’s calvary. François Hollande wanted Israel to “correct” its aim “a bit” (un peu)! He criticised Hamas’s aggression and Israel’s reprisals. But then an angry Benjamin Netanyahu came on the blower to the Elysée. Change of tune. Hollande uttered the usual mantra. “Israel has the right to take all measures to protect its people.” But then French Assembly members became so sickened by the “collective punishment” of the Palestinians that Hollande urged an end to the “escalation” in violence. Phew.” (Robert Fisk ‘Dress the Gaza situation up all you like, but the truth hurts’ http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/dress-the-gaza-situation-up-all-you-like-but-the-truth-hurts-9641240.html July 31, 2014).

Perhaps the most significant political revelation during this latest outbreak of jewish warmongering was netanyahu ordering western leaders i.e. obama, cameron, hollande, etc not to second guess him. More precisely, “never” to second guess him as if he were the ruthless head of a mafia organization putting the frighteners on his flunkies to reinforce his power and authority. “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu summoned US Ambassador Dan Shapiro after yesterday’s Gaza ceasefire crumbled just 90 minutes in, lashing the US policy and warning them to not “ever second guess me again on Hamas.” He went on to insist the US should just trust him to handle things.” (Jason Ditz ‘Netanyahu to US: Don’t ‘Second Guess Me Again’ on Hamas August 02, 2014).[vi] And netanyahu’s flunkies is exactly what they are. The neocons’ hero is winston churchill and leaders of the western world look to netanyahu as churchill’s reincarnation. The jewish state, through its likudnik lobbies in the western world, has been the primary instigator of the west’s wars and sanctions over the last twenty five years.

Ironically the only western democracy that hasn’t been completely corrupted by neocon financial and ideological manipulation is russia where president putin allows the country’s jewish oligarchs to pursue their business interests as long as they do not interfere in the country’s political system. Western oligarchs find this intolerable and want their fellow oligarchs in russia to be returned to power so they can pilfer the russian economy and the country’s vast natural resources as they did in the 1990s. As a consequence they have been pushing western, zionist funded, politicians and the western, zionist dominated, media into demonizing putin – just as they did with saddam hussein, mohammad ahmadinejad, gaddafi, and bashar al-assad. For the first time in over two decades, the western world’s likudnik flunkies are once again thinking the unthinkable – war with russia.

If western politicians allow the jewish nazis in the apartheid state to obtain an outright victory over palestinians in gaza then western oligarchs, western neocon funded politicians, and the western likudnik dominated media, will be inspired into provoking further wars against either russia or iran or both. The jews-only state in palestine does not care about how much such wars would damage the world economy because all they care about is boosting their dominance over the greater middle east. Such wars will transform the western world into carbon copies of libya, syria and iraq. “The only country on earth that needs war is Washington, and that is because Washington’s goal is the neoconservative one of exercising hegemony over the world. Who is so gullible that he cannot recognize that Washington’s lies about Ukraine are like Washington’s lies about Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Iranian nukes, and Assad’s use of chemical weapons? Do you think that the neoconservative influence that prevails in Washington, regardless of the political party in office, is too dangerous to be tolerated?” (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Washington Threatens the World’ http://www.unz.com/proberts/washington-threatens-the-world/ August 08, 2014).

The flares used by the jewish military in lighting up the battlefield over gaza also sheds light on the gross political imbalance of power throughout the western world - the dominance of likudnik lobbies and their funding of politicians, political parties and the mainstream media. What stephen walt says about the role of the zionist lobby in america is also true of virtually every other western country from canada to britain and australia. “The explanation for America's impotent and morally bankrupt policy is the political clout of the Israel lobby. Barack Obama knows that if he were to side with the Palestinians in Gaza or criticize Israel's actions in any way, he would face a firestorm of criticism from the lobby and his chances of getting Congressional approval for a deal with Iran would evaporate.” (Stephen M. Walt ‘AIPAC Is the Only Explanation for America's Morally Bankrupt Israel Policy’ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-m-walt/aipac-americas-israel-policy_b_5607883.html?utm_hp_ref=tw July 22, 2014). Western governments are seriously undermining their national interests because of the moral, political and military, support they are giving to the jewish colonial state and yet they persist in such policies because the likudnik lobbies in these countries have become too big to fail. David cameron remained loyal to the jews-only state even though it put his party’s electoral prospects at risk. He’d also sacrifice his country’s national interest if it meant boosting jewish colonialism.

---

[i] A contrary view is that, “The first notion is that Hamas violated the ceasefire, when in fact the ceasefire terms explicitly did not give Israel any permission to attack tunnels, and the “violation” was actually Hamas fighters inside a tunnel responding to an Israeli attack.” (Jason Ditz ‘Netanyahu to US: Don’t ‘Second Guess Me Again’ on Hamas’ http://news.antiwar.com/2014/08/02/netanyahu-to-us-dont-second-guess-me-again-on-hamas/ August 02, 2014).

[ii] The latest news is that 12 export licenses are being put under review.

[iii] “Appearing on CNN a few days into the current offensive in Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described Hamas as “the worst terrorists, genocidal terrorists.” He said they want to “pile up as many civilian dead as they can,” and, he added, to “use telegenically dead Palestinians for their cause.”” (Rémi Brulin ‘How the Israeli discourse on terrorism seeks to justify blatant war crimes’ http://mondoweiss.net/2014/08/discourse-terrorism-blatant.html August 9, 2014).

[iv] “In the Geneva convention of 1949 on the treatment of occupied populations by the military occupier, civilian non-combatants are called “protected persons”: “ARTICLE 33 - No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. That is why the Israeli blockade of the civilians of Gaza since 2007 is and has all along been a war crime, contravening the Geneva Conventions.” (Juan Cole ‘Israel Still Holding Gaza Civilians Hostage, Doesn’t Get Geneva Conventions’ http://www.juancole.com/2014/08/holding-civilians-conventions.html August 06, 2014).

[v] “The attack on Gaza comes by Saudi Royal Appointment. This royal warrant is nothing less than an open secret in Israel, and both former and serving defense officials are relaxed when they talk about it. Former Israeli defense minister Shaul Mofaz surprised the presenter on Channel 10 by saying Israel had to specify a role for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in the demilitarization of Hamas. Asked what he meant by that, he added that Saudi and Emirati funds should be used to rebuild Gaza after Hamas had been defanged.” (Attack on Gaza by Saudi Royal Appointment’ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-hearst/attack-on-gaza-by-saudi-r_b_5603735.html July 20, 2014).

[vi]  “Sources familiar with conversations between Netanyahu and senior U.S. officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry, say the Israeli leader advised the Obama administration "not to ever second guess me again" on the matter. The officials also said Netanyahu said he should be "trusted" on the issue and about the unwillingness of Hamas to enter into and follow through on cease-fire talks.” (Matthew Lee ‘Netanyahu Tells U.S. 'Not To Ever Second Guess Me Again' On Hamas’ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/02/netanyahu-hamas_n_5643852.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular August 02, 2014).

A Litany of Likudnik Disasters

A single disaster is tragic enough but a litany of disasters suggests something beyond the tragic. These disasters, to name only the most prominent, include the western backed overthrow of mohammed ghaddafi in libya and the subsequent disintegration of that country, the western backed attempt to overthrow president bashar al-assad of syria, the explosive rise of the islamic state in syria and iraq giving rise to an islamic caliphate, the overthrow of the democratically elected morsi government in egypt by a military coup led by a fanatically anti-moslem brotherhood president, etc. However, it is the latest such disasters that are the focus of this article: the latest attack and invasion of gaza by the jews-only state; the fascist ukrainian junta’s rampant war on what it regards as its own people in eastern ukraine; and the shooting down of the malaysian commercial airliner mh17.

The bbc, which still lays claim to impartiality and objectivity, treated the downing of mh17 as if it were an act of war (initiated by russia against britain’s newly found ally, the ukraine) which thereby required it to adopt a patriotic stance in line with the views of the government of the day. Its 24 hour news service became dominated by the disaster thereby downgrading the invasion of gaza by what benjamin netanyahu calls “the one and only-jewish state” to a three minute segment at the end of its regular half hour news cycle – it had long since ignored the ukrainian junta’s military invasion of eastern ukraine. Prior to the downing of the malaysian aircraft, the aerial bombardment of gaza had resulted in the deaths of nearly two hundred palestinians - the vast majority of them innocent, not involved in any military activities, many of whom were children. The invasion of gaza started the day after the downing of mh17 and the death toll of palestinians started to accelerate. Bbc newsreaders expressed not the slightest glimmer of anger or outrage at the deaths of innocent palestinians but their reaction to the downing of the malaysian airliner was full of moral outrage and indignation combined with utter condemnation of those they believed were responsible i.e russian separatists in eastern ukraine and ultimately president putin of russia.

So, from the bbc’s perspective, the slaughter of over two hundred innocent palestinians warranted no moral condemnation whilst the loss of three hundred people in the airplane crash over eastern ukraine was treated with the utmost moral outrage which quickly morphed into incessant and comprehensive condemnations of president putin. The bbc not merely tried to sustain an unjustifiable contrast in its treatment of these two disasters but sought to use the moral outrage over mh17 to give credence to its downgrading of concern over the invasion of gaza. It jumped straight onto what it deemed to be the moral high ground over the downing of mh17 in order to present itself as a valid and trusted arbiter of global morality thereby justifying its neglect of the massacre in gaza. The more forcefully the bbc condemned the downing of mh17 and putin’s alleged role in the disaster, the more it could present itself as a decent, trustworthy and honourable moral arbiter in order to make its crassly bigoted analysis of the one and only-jewish state’s slaughter of unarmed palestinians seem reasonable and just.

This comparative immorality was however far more prevalent beyond the confines of broadcasting house. Whilst the one and only-jewish state (abbreviated here to the jews-only state or jos) had been bombarding gaza, jewish politicians had been continually speculating about the need for a ground invasion. The downing of the airliner enabled netanyahu to conclude that this was a golden opportunity to launch a ground invasion because he knew the western media could preoccupy itself with his tragedy for the next few days at the very least thereby allowing the apartheid state’s merciless attacks on gaza to continue without arousing the wrath of the international community. The mainstream media around the western world duly complied. In effect, the bbc and the rest of the western mainstream media were in cahoots with the racist state to cover up the slaughter in gaza by hyping up condemnations of russian separatists and president putin for their alleged involvement in the downing of the malaysian airliner.

Western governments, heavily dominated by neocon politicians, also hyped up the mh17 disaster to defuse public opinion about the diabolical jewish massacre of palestinians in gaza which has been like shooting fish in a barrel. American politicians gave their full support to the jewish attack on, and invasion of, gaza and so their primary role was hyping up the mh17 disaster to ensure that public anger over gaza did not reach such a point that it forced them into calling for a premature end of the massacre. The british neocon government demanded further sanctions against russia to stop the sale of dual use products that could be used by russia, and thus they believed russian separatists in eastern ukraine, to halt the ukrainian junta’s slaughter of innocent russian speaking people. It did not however made a single statement about sanctioning the jos to stop it from using its armaments to murder innocent palestinians. For jewish extremists in the racist state, western neocon politicians, and the western mainstream media, the downing of the malaysian airliner must have seemed like a gift from god enabling them to get away with yet another moral outrage against the palestinians in gaza without having to face as much of an adverse reaction as there would have been without the disaster over the ukraine.

Western politicians and the western media have heaped such a torrent of scandalous accusations and outrageous lies against russia and especially president putin whilst remaining silent over the jos’s slaughter of palestinians in gaza that it reveals with crystal clarity the extent to which these politicians, broadcasters and journalists are dominated by likudnik interests. America’s likudnik owned congress and its likudnik dominated media have become a laughing stock around the world for their subservience to the interests of the only-jewish state. They have become likudnik—owned bitches willing to do whatever is necessary to deflect criticism of the theft of palestinian land and the slaughter of palestinian people. Western democracies supposedly resting on the principle of private property allows the jewish state to steal palestinian private property without uttering a word of criticism. The neocons are students of levi-strauss who promoted the idea of state’s propounding big lies in order to unify and control society. Western, especially american, neocons have a history of promoting outlandish big lies against their enemies, the most well known of which is that saddam hussein had wmd’s and was in league with al quaeda. American neocon lies over bashar al-assad’s supposed chemical attack on opponents in damascus nearly brought about a western military attack on syria. The preposterous and extravagant denunciations of putin could lead to a war against russia. It is as if neocons around the western world compete with each other to fabricate the biggest and most outrageous lies in the hope of triggering yet more wars that will enhance likudnik interests around the world.

During the bbc’s late thursday evening (July 17) round up of the following day’s newspapers, a newsreader waved in front of the camera a copy of the sun newspaper’s scandalous and sickening front page headline ‘Putin’s Missile’ as if to suggest the sun had correctly interpreted the cause of this terrible event. (The day after this headline was published, a judge dismissed a case brought by a sun on sunday reporter who had attempted to trap a celebrity into selling cocaine, accusing the reporter of being totally unreliable. But then again isn’t this the case with all of murdoch’s hacks around the world? It is highly unlikely that the sun or any murdoch publication was in the slightest bit embarrassed by this judgment).

The following day, the bbc covered the television conference given by president poroshenko, a ukrainian oligarch, who blamed, with total certainty but without a shred of evidence, russian separatists for the downing of the aircraft calling them terrorists before going on to spread the blame to russia and especially putin. It also covered arsenly yatsenyuk’s television conference when he called russian separatists deemed responsible for the tragedy “bastards” – his intention of course was to inflame global political opinion in the hope of increasing the odds that the international community would be willing to provide the ukraine with financial support and nato military protection. The bbc also presented, without any proof of its authenticity, a supposedly secret recording made by ukrainian secret services of a telephone conversation between ukrainian anti-fascists in which a local fighter told his commanding officer that his unit had shot down the malaysian aircraft. Over a week later, the authenticity of the tape has still not been established even though this should be relatively easy to do by naming those in the conversation. If the ukrainian secret services had got a recording of the admission of guilt they must also have the names of those involved in the conversation.

The bbc refused to present any alternative point of view which might cast any doubt over the certainty of its accusation that putin’s private army in eastern ukraine had deliberately shot down the malaysian passenger aircraft. Although it frequently pointed out that there were no confirmable facts it then proceeded on the basis that its accusations were beyond the need of confirmation.

The bbc’s cover-up of the ukrainian government’s military attacks on the people of eastern ukraine and its downplaying of the massacre of palestinians, means that its pretence to a moral stance over the destruction of mh17 was entirely without legitimacy. If the bbc can’t condemn the jewish state for its military operation against virtually unarmed palestinian people and can’t condemn the ukrainian government for similarly using military force against its own people, then it has no credibility over the mh17 tragedy no matter how much it tried to present itself as an impartial and objective reporter of facts. The bbc is no different from the rest of the likudnik dominated western mainstream media which is basically produced by schmucks for the benefit of schmucks.

It is not known who shot down mh17 and it is not even beyond doubt that it was shot down by a missile launched from the ground. The airliner could have been destroyed by a bomb on board the plane – it seems a little coincidental that two malaysian airliners have been lost over the last couple of months. It could have been shot down by a fighter jet. Despite these doubts, the president of the united states declared on saturday (july 19), presumably after consulting with his intelligence services, that the aircraft had been shot down by a missile “from an area controlled by russian backed ukrainian rebels”. However, after the embarrassing debacle over his allegation that the syrian government was responsible for the chemical weapons attack on damascus because the missiles had allegedly emanated from “an area controlled by the syrian government” then perhaps he should have been more politically circumspect and avoided reminding people of this mistake by using virtually the same phraseology. Since his security forces had got it so wrong about the origin in damascus of the syrian chemical missiles why should anyone invest any confidence in them to get it right in the ukraine? Especially when the military situation on the ground in the ukraine is so fluid. President ronald reagan described the american shooting down of an iranian airliner as an “understandable accident”. “… on July 3, 1988, the USS Vincennes fired a missile that brought down an Iranian civilian airliner in the Persian Gulf, killing 290 people, an act which President Ronald Reagan explained as an “understandable accident”).” (Ray McGovern ‘Facts Needed on Malaysian Plane Shoot-Down’ http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/07/19-2 July 19, 2014). If russian separatists had downed the malaysian aircraft it would be far more of an accident than when the commander of one of america’s most technologically advanced destroyers, downed the iranian airliner. But the days when americans might feel a little understanding or sympathy for those who had brought about the mh17 disaster because of what their military had done to an iranian airliner are well and truly over. These days americans are exceptionalists (something like secular dispensationalists) who can do no wrong despite the mountain of corpses they have piled up around the middle east over the last twenty five years.

In comparison to the bbc’s utterly odious presentations of the three disasters in the ukraine and gaza, al jazeera choose to keep at the top of its news agenda the jewish military operation against unarmed palestinian civilians in gaza. It rightly believed that the deliberate killing of innocent people in gaza was a far more important news story than the seemingly accidental downing of mh17. Its coverage of the mh17 catastrophe has been far more moderate, sensible and reasonable than that of the bbc’s despite the fact that on most other issues it generally treats putin with a degree of contempt.

By far and away the best media presentation of these three tragedies has come from russian television. Not only has it raised important questions about the downing of the malaysian aircraft, it has highlighted the aggressiveness of the ukrainian government’s military offensive against its own people as a background to the mh17 tragedy. The western public is shocked that a passenger aircraft could have been shot down but this is primarily because it knows so little about the scale of the war the ukrainian government has launched on its own people. The ukrainian military is besieging and then flattening large numbers of villages across the region. It is shelling residential areas in major cities in eastern ukraine. It has killed thousands of innocent people and forced hundreds of thousands of ordinary people to flee from their homes in case they become yet another casualty of such indiscriminate attacks. Is it surprising that such attacks have led to a resistance movement which seeks to get hold of any weapons it can to defend itself even though most of its fighters have no military training? It is absurd to believe that russian anti-fascists are not going to try to continue shooting down ukrainian fighter jets given the carnage that the these jets have unleashed against their own people.

One of the most pertinent questions rt raised is why the ukrainian government allowed commercial airliners to fly over a war zone especially when it knew that over the previous few months helicopters, air transporters, and fighter jets had been shot down by resistance fighters? If anyone could be blamed for the accidental shooting down of mh17 then it has to be the fascist ukrainian government for allowing passenger flights over such a dangerous war zone. It has even been proposed that the plane was diverted from the normal route over eastern ukraine to one that took it even closer to the fighting.

The reason the fascist ukrainian government refused to stop commercial jets flying over the war zone is because for the last few months it has been trying to pretend that there has been no war taking place in eastern ukraine and that the hundreds of thousands of people fleeing the ukrainian military’s indiscriminate shelling of their homes was not a humanitarian disaster warranting help from the united nations.

During the last weeks of june, the russian, german and french governments tried to persuade poroshenko’s fascist government to continue a ceasefire in eastern ukraine. But it refused to do so and, at the beginning of july, launched a wholesale military campaign to crush the resistance fighters. Poroshenko launched this latest round of the war without stopping airliners from flying over the war zone. Putin is thus correct in arguing that if the fascist government had not decided to renew its military attacks rather than seeking a peace agreement then this tragedy would never have happened. “On Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin deflected questions about who may have fired the missile as he called for an international investigation. But he made a telling point when he noted that the “tragedy would not have happened if military actions had not been renewed in southeast Ukraine.”” (Ray McGovern ‘Facts Needed on Malaysian Plane Shoot-Down’ http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/07/19-2 July 19, 2014). See also, “Putin is more than correct when he stressed this tragedy would not have happened if Poroshenko had agreed to extend a cease-fire, as Merkel, Hollande and Putin tried to convince him in late June. At a minimum, Kiev is already guilty because they are responsible for safe passage of flights in the airspace they - theoretically - control.” (Pepe Escobar ‘It was Putin's missile!’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/CEN-01-190714.html July 18, 2014).

But then again perhaps the shooting down of this aircraft is exactly what the poroshenko government was hoping might happen knowing that this would give the junta a huge publicity coup against the anti-fascists and that this would encourage western countries to offer political and military protection to the ukraine. Just as the anti-fascists sought to provoke putin into invading eastern ukraine so perhaps poroshenko might have hoped that some sort of tragic incident would force the west to come to the country’s rescue. Such a dire accusation cannot be that far off the mark given that this fascist government has so enthusiastically slaughtered its own people and given that the russian government has revealed that a fighter jet was in the vicinity of the mh17 airliner just before it was downed. This has led some to speculate that the jet fighter was using the airliner as a human shield before attacking its targets in novorussiya. At the moment the relatives of the victims of mh17 are mourning their losses but once they start campaigning for justice for their loved ones they are almost certain to initiate litigation against the ukrainian government for such gross irresponsibilities. Perhaps even against the american government which it is pretending that it didn’t know there were any anti-aircraft weapons in eastern ukraine prior to the downing of mh17 whilst also maintaining that they were tracking the flow of armaments from russia to the ukraine.

The ukrainian government’s military offensive against its own people is almost identical to the jos’s military offensive against palestinians in gaza. The ukrainian military is besieging and flattening eastern ukraine in exactly the same way the jos is besieging and flattening gaza. In both cases, the militaries cut off villages, besiege them by destroying all power and water supplies and then shell residential areas indiscriminately whilst claiming they are targeting only militants. They both claim that militants are hiding in residential areas or hospitals or public buildings or ambulances which justifies the military attacks on such places. Basically what both militaries are doing is indiscriminately firing rockets, missiles or shells anywhere they want and then claiming that the buildings or vehicles they have hit or demolished have been used by militants as a hiding place. Such a claim basically allows both militaries to do whatever they want no matter how illegal it might be. Both governments prefer to pursue a lebensraum policy rather than pursue any peace agreement – the only difference being is that whilst russian speaking ukrainians can flee to russia or other parts of the ukraine the palestinians living in the gazan open prison have nowhere to go. But then again is it that surprising that the ukrainian military is acting similarly to the jewish military when its jewish president and prime minister have such close contacts with the jews-only state and espouse the same likudnik propaganda?

The jos continually insists it has a right to defend itself. Western neocons regurgitate the same proposition. However, this proposition is more than just a statement of the obvious. It’s first implication is that the jos can go on the military offensive slaughtering large numbers of innocent people whilst claiming it is only defending itself. Secondly, this proposition implies the jos has the right to use whatever scale of military force it wants against unarmed civilians. Thirdly, the jewish state believes that its right of self defence is a special human right applicable only to jews – it does not apply to palestinians. Palestinians have no right to defend themselves. They just have to suffer whatever the jewish state decides to impose upon them. The bbc for example has never once mentioned that palestinians have a right to defend themselves against overwhelming military force. American politicians, bought and paid for by jewish oligarchs, also believe the jewish state is entitled to this exclusive human right. Any act of self defence by palestinians is instantly denounced as an act of aggression which cannot be tolerated.

The fourth implication of the jews’ exclusive right to defend themselves is that palestinians always initiate conflicts to which the jews are forced to respond. According to this propaganda, hamas continually fires rockets at the jewish state which eventually gets fed up of being attacked forcing it to try and stop such attacks. The racist state is thus portrayed as a poor, innocent victim of psychopathic palestinian aggression. But this propaganda is so much hasbara. After the zionist state’s attack on gaza in november 2012 hamas abided by the ceasefire agreement and did not fire any rockets at the jewish state for 19 months. It resumed firing rockets on july 7. “Thus, a report from an authoritative Israeli source described the provocation for the resumption of rocket fire: Hamas rocket fire began only after Israeli forces had engaged in nearly a month of military operations in violation of the ceasefire agreement and had killed 6 Hamas members in Gaza. The facts show that Israeli forces had to work quite hard to get Hamas to end its cease-fire. The killing of the six Hamas members was not an isolated event. Israeli forces and settlers had gone wild on the West Bank starting on June 12 after the kidnapping of three Israeli teens. Israeli forces had also attacked 60 targets in Gaza during those three weeks of June. Then, on the night of July 7, 2014, the Israeli Air Force had attacked approximately 50 more “terrorist targets” in the Gaza Strip, as described in the ITIC report.” James Marc Leas ‘Why Did Bernie Sanders Get Gaza So Wrong?’ http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/07/24/why-did-bernie-sanders-get-gaza-so-wrong/ July 24, 2014). See also, “The claim that Israel is merely acting in self-defense fails on a number of counts. As I and others have been saying from the beginning, the Netanyahu government willfully and cynically used the murders of three Israelis as an excuse to provoke Hamas with mass arrests and widespread activities that included the deaths of nine Palestinian civilians before this operation started. That removes the self-defense argument from the start.” (Mitchell Plitnick ‘Israel-Palestine: Correcting Some Faulty Ideas on Both Sides’ http://www.lobelog.com/israel-palestine-correcting-some-faulty-ideas/ July 26, 2014).

The likudnik dominated american government also uses this moral exclusivity to its political advantage. Hence it believes the fascist ukrainian government has a right to defend itself against what it labels as terrorists but the supposed terrorists i.e. civilian russian speakers in eastern ukraine have no right to defend themselves against the onslaughts of the ukrainian military. American neocons also claim exclusivity over the ‘right to protect’ principle wherever american citizens are involved and does not allow this principle to be used by any other country seeking to protect its citizens e.g. russia is not allowed to protect its citizens being slaughtered in the ukraine. When putin tries to help his compatriots he is allegedly involved in anschluss.

In case this analysis might lead some to suggest that there is some left wing bias involved here, it is necessary to point out that whilst russia and the anti-fascists in the ukraine cannot be blamed for deliberately shooting down a commercial airliner and that putin is acting as a global peacemaker in helping anti fascists resist the fascist ukrainian government’s military slaughter in eastern ukraine, there is one major way in which putin deserves condemnation. He is helping president sisi to consolidate his grip over egypt and to continue with his odious policy of besieging the palestinians in gaza. Sisi’s hatred of hamas is leading him to inflict collective punishment on palestinians in gaza and he’d probably have joined in the shelling of gaza if his country wasn’t economically bankrupt – perhaps using russian armaments supplied to him by putin. Putin’s desire to establish a political and military foothold in egypt has led him to abandon the palestinians. The palestinians have never been so alone as they are today. Around the world they have virtually no friends. Only turkey and, ironically, a few shia governments in the middle east are willing to defend them politically. Not even that rampaging group of drugged out religious nutcases isis protest about what the jewish state is inflicting on their co-religionists. The saudis have finally given up trying to pretend they care anything about the palestinians. Ever since the jewish lobby in america offered to protect the saudis from any political recriminations over their role in 9/11, the saudis have become bitches to their jewish masters and their sole political role has been to prevent arabs around the world from understanding the degree of their capitulation. The saudis have financed isis and sisi (truly a mirror image of each other) so perhaps the palestinians are better off without the stench of saudi state fundamentalists, the world’s greatest sponsor of state terrorism. Is it any wonder that the world’s two greatest terrorist states have teamed up together to destroy hamas in gaza. “The attack on Gaza comes by Saudi Royal Appointment. This royal warrant is nothing less than an open secret in Israel, and both former and serving defense officials are relaxed when they talk about it. Former Israeli defense minister Shaul Mofaz surprised the presenter on Channel 10 by saying Israel had to specify a role for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in the demilitarization of Hamas. Asked what he meant by that, he added that Saudi and Emirati funds should be used to rebuild Gaza after Hamas had been defanged.” (Attack on Gaza by Saudi Royal Appointment’ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-hearst/attack-on-gaza-by-saudi-r_b_5603735.html July 20, 2014).

The invasion of gaza is part of an incremental lebensraum policy to remove all palestinians from palestine. Just as the jos continually steals palestinian land in the west bank so it is pushing the gazan border closer and closer to the sea. Gaza is surrounded by a fence which nominally marks the border with the jewish state but over the years the jos has created an increasingly large no-man’s land on the gazan side of the fence which gazans can no longer access. Gaza was once 140 square miles in size but the continual expansion of this no-man’s land is increasingly eating into this space forcing increasing numbers of palestinians to live in smaller areas. If this lebensraum process continues then eventually most gazans will be living on the beach.

Netanyahu’s extreme right wing fascist government has realized that now is the time to decimate the palestinians, or perhaps make their lives so infernal that it drives them out of the country, without the global community raising a finger of protest. Human morality is in a downspin and is being pushed towards a self destructive global oblivion by rampant neocons around the world especially in america, but also in britain, france, canada, australia, the ukraine saudi arabia, and even russia itself. If the heads of state of america, britain, france, canada, and australia were to meet to discuss their countries’ long term objective it would be to promote a neocon agenda waging wars against enemies of the racist state and boosting the expansion of the jewish colonial state in the middle east. The neocons are renowned for their admiration of winston churchill but they believe the politician who most closely resembles his qualities is benjamin netanyahu, the leader of the free world, the world’s greatest promoter and instigator of islamophobia.

The western world’s willingness to tolerate a nation blockading and besieging 2 million people for the last 8 years keeping them in an open prison is not merely a reflection of its political decadence but is indicative of the control that the racist state has over western countries. Jewish oligarchs have basically bought off western politicians and the western media who thereby sacrifice their own national interests for the sake of boosting the jewish empire and global jewish power. The invasion of iraq, and the threat of wars against syria and iran, are not in the national interests of the western world. They are of benefit only to the jews-only state.


See also 'The Jewish Wehrmacht always targets Civilians: the Jewish Wehrmacht’s Insanely disproportionate use of Violence against Unarmed Civilians'

http://themundiclub.blogspot.co.uk/2009/01/jewish-wehrmacht-always-targets.html