March 24, 2008

Hitler’s Second State

Zionists’ goal of Creating a Jews-only State.
Since its conceptualization in the late 19thcentury, the goal of zionism has been to create a jews-only state in palestine. The hope was that once this state had been established, all jews around the world would emigrate to palestine and all palestinians would be removed, dead or alive, from their own country. After the second world war zionist terrorists began terrorizing palestinians to force them out of the country and then stole their land to create the illegal jewish state.(1) The process of terrorizing people into fleeing their homes and country, or deporting people from their own country, or killing them because they won’t leave, is what is currently called ethnic cleansing. In the days of the nazis it was called ‘lebensraum’: the creation of living room for the german volk.

The zionists’ propaganda slogan was, "A people without a country, for a country without a people". This clearly reveals that from the very start, zionists were nazis long before the nazis came into being. The similarities between these two ideologies were reinforced in the 1930s by a close political collaboration between zionists and nazis.(2) The nazi character of zionism became manifest during zionists’ violent establishment of the jews-only state. Zionists modeled their state on the nazi state in order to pursue similar totalitarian goals.(3)

Jews’ recent goal of Starving Palestinians into Submission.
In january 2006, hamas won the general election in palestine to become the palestinians’ legitimate government. Jewish leaders were so incensed by hamas’s victory they decided to ramp up their lebensraum policy by gradually starving palestinians into submission either forcing them to flee palestine or to die in their own country. "The Hamas team had not laughed so much in a long time. The team, headed by the prime minister's advisor Dov Weissglas and including the Israel Defense Forces chief of staff, the director of the Shin Bet and senior generals and officials, convened for a discussion with Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni on ways to respond to the Hamas election victory. Everyone agreed on the need to impose an economic siege on the Palestinian Authority, and Weissglas, as usual, provided the punch line: "It's like an appointment with a dietician. The Palestinians will get a lot thinner, but won't die," the advisor joked, and the participants reportedly rolled with laughter. And, indeed, why not break into laughter and relax when hearing such a successful joke? If Weissglas tells the joke to his friend Condoleezza Rice, she would surely laugh too." (Gideon Levy ‘A Chilling Heartlessness: As Israel's Hamas Team Laughs’ February 20, 2006). The jews continually launched military raids into occupied palestine, taking care to maximize civilian fatalities, and then used palestinians’ token acts of resistance to whip up domestic and international support for tightening the blockade.(4)

Gaza: From Refugee Camp to Prison to Concentration Camp.
Gaza becomes a Refugee Camp.
In 1948, jewish terrorists drove hundreds of thousands of palestinians from their homes to establish as racially pure a jewish state as it was practically feasible to create at that moment in time given the military balance of power in the middle east. Many palestinians ended up in refugee camps in neighbouring countries where they and their offspring still live in appalling conditions. Some fled to the gaza strip which became an internal refugee camp. "With just under two million people, it (the gaza strip) has one of the world's highest population densities. Half of all the people in Gaza are refugees, or their descendants, from Israeli wars." (Peter Beaumont ‘Gaza's falling wall changes Middle East map for ever’,,2247566,00.html January 27, 2008).

Gaza becomes an Occupied Territory.
After the 1967 war, the jewish army occupied the gaza strip and the west bank and forced palestinians to live under brutal military rule. The jews turned palestinians into stateless people in their own country and took the opportunity to deport as many as they could.(5) For the following forty years, the jews denied palestinians any political rights but allowed them a small degree of economic development.(6)

Gaza becomes a Prison.
After hamas’s electoral victory in january 2006, the jews turned gaza into something resembling an open prison. Palestinians were stopped from exporting/importing commodities without the express permission of their jailers which was usually not forthcoming leaving huge amounts of food to rot at the borders between the two political entities. Palestinians’ living standards plummeted.(7)

However, as the jews’ blockade on gaza tightened and the jewish wehrmacht killed increasing numbers of innocent palestinians, comparisons between gaza and an open prison became increasingly divorced from reality. "A refugee camp now for three generations, it should feel like a dump for unwanted humanity: but everywhere you go you are impressed by the resilience of people, their deep desire to get on and lead better lives. The world's largest prison, Gaza is often called, but that understates it. At least in a prison, people know more or less how long they are going to be there. Gaza is the world capital of uncertainty, of lives unfulfilled. So much suffering for so many in such a confined space is literally unbearable." (Barbara Stocking, Director of Oxfam ‘The state of Gaza should shame us all’ January 31, 2008).

Gaza becomes a Concentration Camp.
In june 2007, hamas overthrew the quisling palestinian authority in gaza thereby pre-empting an attack on hamas by a paramilitary force led by mohammad dahlan which had been financed and armed by likudniks in the bush regime and by the jews-only state. The jews were appalled by this turn of events and used this as an excuse to transform gaza into a concentration camp. In civilized countries, prisoners are given regular meals, decent accommodation, and are legally entitled to be protected from vindictive or cruel treatment at the hands of prison guards and other prisoners. However, in the gazan concentration camp, the jews were intent on starving, brutalizing, or executing, their prisoners. They employed a range of population reduction methods from targeted assassinations; military incursions maximizing the "accidental" deaths of innocent palestinians; the denial of hospital treatment for sick people or pregnant women which often led to fatalities; the refusal to allow in medicines. The jews increased their culling of palestinians albeit at a rate which wouldn’t arouse too much global indignation. They used access to medical treatment as a bribe to extract information about gaza’s palestinian inmates.

In the 1930s the nazis organized conferences for state and party officials to ensure the legality of their extermination programme. This preoccupation with providing legal cover for acts of barbarism, is yet another tactic the zionist state has borrowed from the nazis. In 1967, after the jewish invasion of gaza and the west bank the legal status of these two palestinian enclaves was defined by international law as areas under occupation. This meant the jewish military had a legal duty to look after their palestinian prisoners. However, after the democratically elected hamas government forced the palestinian authority out of gaza, the jews-only state redesignated gaza as a "hostile entity" to make it legally permissible for jews to deny food, energy, medicines, water, etc, to their palestinian inmates.(8) In other words, they transformed gaza from a prison to a concentration camp.(9)

Jews carrying out Genocide in Gaza.
After the conceptualization of zionism in the late 19thcentury, zionists endlessly debated how to get rid of palestine’s indigenous peoples. They faced exactly the same dilemma about what to do with palestinians that the nazis would face four decades later over europe’s jews: mass deportations or mass extermination. (They had no more interest in reaching a peace accord with palestinians than the nazis desired peace with european jews). But, after the founding of the zionist state, neither option was viable. The mass expulsion of all palestinians was much too dangerous politically and militarily since such huge numbers of palestinians in neighbouring countries might have encouraged them to launch revenge attacks on the jews-only state leading to a regional war. The mass extermination of palestinians was simply not politically feasible given the emergence of a new world order in which two superpowers, russia and america, competed for allies to boost their international dominance. So the jews’ only option was terrorizing palestinians on a piecemeal basis without arousing too much global indignation. However, after the collapse of the soviet empire and the increasing control of america’s jewish elite over the bush regime, the jews acquired a freehand to implement their long term objective of genocide against the palestinian people.(10)

A Jewish Nazi Promises a Holocaust against the Palestinians.
The rise of nazi, and stalinist, totalitarian forms of government and the second world war resulted in the slaughter of around 50 million people. This outbreak of totalitarianism was the most self-destructive carnage in human history. However, zionist propagandists abstracted from this terrible series of events the idea of "a holocaust" inflicted on only one group of people. Over the decades, this propaganda had two consequences. Firstly, "the holocaust" became more politically significant than totalitarianism and the second world war. Secondly, focussing attention on the deaths of millions of jews pushed the deaths of all others in this global carnage into the background. The holocaust industry’s propaganda was so successful that today it is possible to ask any westerner what they understand by the phrase "the Holocaust" and they will refer solely to the extermination of jews as if the deaths of all others during the age of totalitarianism did not matter or did not occur. Today, nobody talks about a polish holocaust, (11) a russian holocaust, an european holocaust, or even a german holocaust. The so-called "Holocaust" (Shoah) is a jews-only phenomenon.

Jewish revisionists have corrupted history by fabricating the notion of a "jews-only Holocaust" which deserves greater political prominence than nazi/stalinist totalitarianism, the second world war, and the deaths of 50 million people. The "jews-only Holocaust" is not merely the worst that has ever happened in human history (not true); nothing like it has happened since (not true); and it is the worst that could ever happen in human history (highly unlikely). It has assumed such monumental phantasmagorical proportions that it now verges on the blasphemous for anyone to draw comparisons between it and other massacres in human history. "The centrality of the Holocaust in Jewish consciousness caused the Jews to insist on its absolute exclusiveness. We are shocked and furious when somebody tries to remind us that the Nazis exterminated other communities too, such as the Roma, the homosexuals and the mentally ill. We get very angry when somebody comes and compares "our" Holocaust with other genocides: Armenians, Cambodians, Tutsis in Ruanda and others. Really! How can one compare?" (Uri Avnery ‘Memory of the Holocaust: from Jewish property into human possession’ March 19, 2005).(12)

At the end of february 2008, the zionist’s deputy defence minister, speaking in hebrew, suddenly blurted out that the zionist state was intent on inflicting an even greater Shoah on palestinians than the nazis had inflicted on the jews. "The more Qassam fire intensifies and the rockets reach a longer range, they will bring upon themselves a bigger holocaust because we will use all our might to defend ourselves," Matan Vilnai, the Deputy Defence Minister said." (James Hider ‘Israel threatens to unleash 'holocaust' in Gaza’ March 1, 2008). This confession was an explosive political shock for many reasons.

Firstly, vilnai was implying the jews could be even more barbaric than the nazis.

Secondly, if vilnai was justifying a jewish holocaust against palestinians wasn’t he also justifying the nazi holocaust against jews? "Well, if Israel thinks that carrying out a holocaust against its victims in Gaza and Rafah and Khan Younis can be justified, then why blame Hitler for effecting a holocaust against his own respective enemies? Is Vilnai vindicating the holocaust?" (Khalid Amayreh ‘Jews and the Gaza Holocaust’ March 1, 2008).

Thirdly, vilnai was implying the jews were like nazis. "It is clear beyond any doubt that the Israeli Deputy Defence Minister was far from being reluctant to equate Israel with Nazi Germany when revealing the genocidal future awaiting the Palestinian people …" (Gilad Atzmon ‘Freedom of Speech: the right to equate Gaza with Auschwitz’ March 01, 2008).

Fourthly, the word Shoah is supposed to be used only about the nazi slaughter of jews so when vilnai used it to threaten palestinians he was debasing one of the sacred tenets of this new secular religion. "Is it only when Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai used the word shoah to describe what will come to Gaza that some media outlets took note. Here was an Israeli government official himself invoking the Holocaust, of his people's most horrific massacre, in reference to the fate of Gaza. But it was not necessarily because Gazans may suffer the same fate that they were perturbed, but rather that this event, this phrase, genocide or holocaust, could be used with such seeming levity, that using such a loaded term may somehow lessen the true horror of the original act." (Laila El-Haddad ‘The Gaza genocide’ March 02, 2008). What made the blasphemy even worse was that the blasphemer was jewish.

A number of jewish commentators immediately responded to this public relations’ disaster by trying to muddy the water to limit the political damage so the world wouldn’t take vilnai’s statement at face value and would not infer that those carrying out this "bigger holocaust" were jewish nazis.(13)

Palestinian responses to the threat of a Jewish Holocaust.
After suffering from six decades of jewish terrorism whilst their tormentors indulged in the financially and morally extortionate propaganda of ‘There’s no Business Like Shoah Business’, palestinians were quick to highlight the jewish threat of a "Shoah" against them.(14)

After seeing dozens of palestinian children slaughtered by the jewish wehrmacht, and after the threat of a "Holocaust" against the palestinian people, a lone palestinian reacted with rage by killing eight trainee religious soldiers at the mercaz harav yeshiva. Yeshivas are religious indoctrination and military training centres which churn out judaic fundamentalists to help jewish settlers to terrorize, and even kill, palestinians in order to steal their land and build more illegal jewish settlements.(15) Indeed, true to its nature, the mercaz harav yeshiva had been built on land stolen from palestinians and was thus another illegal jewish settlement. Over the decades it had become, "the mother of all settlements." (Uri Avnery "Kill a Hundred Turks and Rest": The Five-Day War in Gaza March 10, 2008).(16) Yeshiva students are jewish nazis who are indoctrinated into believing that palestinians are subhumans. "The Israeli media, which is subject to routine government censorship, normally avoids giving "detrimental details" about Palestinian resistance attacks, especially when Israelis get killed, ostensibly in order to reap maximum propaganda benefits by giving an initial impression that the victims were innocent civilians, not soldiers or settlers. The Israeli media, especially those targeting foreign audiences, also ignored the fact that Merkaz Ha'rav, the ideological central nervous system of religious messianic Zionism, combines Talmudic studies with military training in its educational program. This is known in Hebrew as "Hesder Merkaz" Even Yitzhak Rabin’s killer, Yigal Amir, is reportedly to have studied at the Merkaz Ha’rav." (Khalid Amayreh ‘Soldiers (not innocent students) killed at settler center’ March 08, 2008).

The yeshiva rabbinical council’s response to the revenge attack was to demand an increase in the jewish seige of gaza. "The responsibility for the massacre lies with the governments of Israel, which for years have displayed weakness and exhaustion and have seen to the armament of the enemy," the Yesha Rabbinical Council wrote in a stinging rebuke of the Israeli leadership following the Thursday's deadly terror attack against a Jerusalem yeshiva. Calling the seminary a "flagship of those who love the Torah and the country," the council vowed that the spirit of the yeshiva would "triumph over the evil." Many of the students who attend Mercaz HaRav belong to the settlement movement. "Even now, the government is continuing to supply electricity and fuel to the Gaza Strip and negotiate with a Holocaust denier (an apparent reference to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas) over the division of Israel and holy Jerusalem," wrote the council." (‘Yesha rabbis: Government responsible for yeshiva massacre’,7340,L-3516098,00.html March 07, 2008). One rabbi made his desires clear. "Meanwhile, a prominent rabbi has once again called the Palestinians Amalekites, which the Bible says "must be destroyed" and "wiped out from the face of earth." Amalekites were members of an ancient nomadic people of ancient Palestine which the Bible says were descendants of Esau's grandson, Amalek. The Rabbi, Ya’akov Shapira, who is also the current Director of Merkaz Ha’rav, suggested that all Palestinians would have to be exterminated. "The murderers are the Amalekites of our day, coming to remind us that Amalekites have not disappeared, just changed their appearance," the rabbi was quoted as saying." (Khalid Amayreh ‘Soldiers (not innocent students) killed at settler center’ March 08, 2008).(17)

Zionists are as bad as the Nazis.
Zionists are transforming gaza into a concentration camp with the objective of starving or terrorizing palestinians into leaving palestine or simply slaughtering them. They are carrying out a lebensraum policy.(18) In other words, a genocide, a holocaust, against the palestinian people. What the zionist state is doing to six million palestinians is in principle no different from what the nazis did to the jews.(19)

Hitler’s Second State.
The connections between zionism and nazism are blatant. The originators of zionism in the late 19thcentury were intent on establishing a racially pure jewish state. They endlessly discussed whether it would be better to deport palestinians or to exterminate them (whilst frequently pretending they did not exist). The zionists most famous battle cry "A people without a country, for a country without a people" was nazi-like long before hitler founded nazism. It is exactly the sort of slogan hitler could have used when talking about the german colonization of poland and russia. In terms of the development of political concepts, zionist ideology provided hitler with important ideas in his formulation of nazism.

Zionist ideology did not merely help to give birth to nazi ideology. Throughout hitler’s time in power zionists enthusiastically co-operated with the nazis because they believed the nazis would help them create a jewish state in palestine. Zionists did not object to the nazis’ anti-semitic propaganda because they realized that the more the nazis alienated assimilated german jews the more such jews would want to emigrate to palestine to set up a jews-only state.(20) Zionists controlled jewish communities across europe.(21) They compelled jews to co-operate fully with the nazis when jews were being stripped of their assets and citizenship before being shipped east to oblivion. Zionists demands for jewish people to abide by nazi orders led to millions of jews walking to their deaths like Sheep. If jewish people had refused to cooperate with the nazis, even if they’d only refused to answer their front doors when the nazis came to pick them up to take them to the railway station, the numbers of jews who lost their lives would have been a fraction of those eventually lost. Zionists ended up sacrificing millions of jews in order to push small numbers of jews to palestine to fight for a jewish state. The zionists were responsible for a significant proportion of jewish deaths during the nazi period because of their insistence on jewish co-operation with the nazis.

In many ways there would never have been a jews-only state in palestine without the nazis. Balfour’s imperial commitment to a jewish homeland and the growing political and economic power of jews living in america both contributed to the establishment of the jews-only state in palestine but the biggest contributor was adolf hitler. Without hitler’s rise to power, without his provoking the second world war, and without his efforts to exterminate jews, the zionists would never have succeeded in de-assimilating jews from their country of birth and then helping them to escape to palestine to create a zionist state. And the jewish state would never have been recognized internationally if the international community hadn’t been sympathetic to the jewish people for what the nazis had inflicted on them. The international community’s sympathy for the jews deterred it from raising any objections when the zionists used nazi methods to create a zionist state and modeled their jews-only state upon nazi principles.

The jews-only state is in many ways hitler’s second state. It is a monument to nazi principles. The jews undoubtedly suffered a terrible nakba during the nazi reign but the zionist propaganda of "the Holocaust’ has been cynically used to cover up some hideous nazi-like realities. Firstly, that zionists collaborated with the nazis to inflict a catastrophe on their own people. Secondly, zionists manipulated european guilt about the slaughter of european jews to win support for the creation of a jews-only state based on nazi principles. And, thirdly, that zionists have been inflicting a "nazi holocaust" on palestinians for the last sixty years.(22)

The Zionists’ Promotion of a Third World War.
After the stupendous carnage of the second world war it might have been thought that today no rational decent person would ever want the world to suffer another such massive outbreak of death and destruction. And yet jewish zionist commentators seem intent on provoking world war three (or world war four as some of them suggest). "I hope and pray that President Bush will do it (attack iran). Although many persist in denying it, I continue to believe that what Sept 11, 2001, did was to plunge us headlong into nothing less than another world war. I call this new war World War IV, because I also believe that what is generally known as the Cold War was actually World War III, and that this one bears a closer resemblance to that great conflict than it does to World War II." (Norman Podhoretz ‘The Case for Bombing Iran’ May 30, 2007). Jewish zionists, and they alone, concocted the idea of a third/fourth world war. They are the sole promoters of such a world war. And they are the primary activists manipulating the world’s greatest military power into another such war. Jewish zionists, and jewish zionists alone, initiated this monstrously evil policy which is now becoming popular amongst zionist quislings like george bush, tony blair, gordon brown, and nicholas sarkosy.(23)

The critical question that needs to be asked is not how terrible was the jews’ suffer during the reign of nazism but what was the true horror involved in nazi totalitarianism? Certainly the nazis’ extermination of minorities from the mentally retarded, the disabled, to homosexuals, and those on the extreme left was horrifying. As was the extermination of non-arayan peoples from gypsies, poles, russians, slavs, and jews. The appearance of extermination camps revealed the nazis’ shocking depravity and monstrous evil. Perhaps even more horrifying is that millions of ordinary, civilized, non-racist, law abiding, people contributed to this extermination process. The appearance of extermination camps in the centre of europe being run by ordinary civilized people shakes to the core our understanding of a civilized society. How is it possible to gauge whether a society is civilized enough to resist such a moral collapse or not? But the greatest horror of nazism is something much more obvious: its virulent warmongering, its constant invasion of one country after another, until the whole world was swallowed up in death and destruction. The essence of nazism was not concentration camps nor ideology but the desire to wage perpetual war, a war without end, a world war to achieve its long term political objectives. Today, those who support world war three are by definition the new nazis and most of them are jewish zionists.

The zionists manipulated america into the invasion of afghanistan. There was no need for the american military to invade afghanistan. American politicians had spent the 1980s condemning the soviet empire for invading and occupying the country. The bush regime could have sent in a crack team of military specialists to track down and capture osama bin laden. But zionists and the american jewish lobby were desperate to push the american military into the greater middle east because they saw this as the first step in a series of wars leading to world war three. The invasion of afghanistan was not a one-off military move designed to capture or kill a group of terrorists. It was the first step towards world war three. The invasion of iraq had nothing to do with saddam’s non-existent nuclear weapons nor his non-existent relationship with al quaeda. It was the second step towards world war three. Zionists are currently stirring up islamophobia against lebanon, syria, and iran, in the hope that the next war against one of these countries will trigger world war three. The turmoil created by america’s proxy zionist invasions of afghanistan and iraq has now spread to pakistan and zionist commentators are arguing there is now a need to invade that country as well. And zionists are similarly stirring up demands for intervention in egypt and saudi arabia. There is no point in objecting to the invasion of afghanistan, and then objecting to the invasion of iraq, and then objecting to an invasion of iran or pakistan or lebanon etc as if these are all isolated events. These invasions are part of a grand design to provoke world war three. It is imperative to oppose the new nazis, people who are so hysterical and paranoid as to relish the idea of another world war. Only zionists are fixated on 1939. They are a mere step away from their goal of starting a new world war.(24)

Zionists compare everyone with Hitler and the Nazis but they’re just Objectifying.
Ever since the end of the second world war, zionists have accused their enemies of being nazis and enemy leaders of being hitlers. First it was president nasser of egypt. Then saddam hussein. Then osama bin laden. Then mullah omah. Then yasser arafat. Then it was mahmoud ahmadinejad even though iran is proud of its indigenous jewish community which has lived happily in the country for millenia. "Since last year, when we gathered together in this city, events have gone from bad to worse," said Howard Kohr, Aipac's executive director, addressing a record number of delegates during his opening night address. Kohr's sobering speech was an exercise in Holocaust analogy. It was preceded by a short video bluntly comparing Iran to Nazi Germany and the Islamic Republic's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to Adolph Hitler. "The parallels of the geopolitical climate of March 5, 1933, and that of March 5, 2006, are stunning in their likeness, eerie in their implication," Kohr said, adding, "Unlike the ominous days of the 1930s, this time we must not ignore the approaching thunder." (Ori Nir ‘Reporter’s Notebook’ March 10, 2006). More recently it’s been hassan nasrallah.(25) And at the moment it’s ismail haniyeh.

Let’s ignore the utter preposterousness of comparing such leaders with one of the most devastatingly powerful military’s in european and human history. Let’s ignore the even more preposterous allegation that there seems to be quite a few hitlers around the world at the present moment which is all too reminiscent of the woody allen film where two identical napoleon bonapartes end up scuffling with each other in someone’s drawing room.

The zionists pouring out these hysterical accusations are exposing their own nazi-like mentality. They are simply objectifying their own attitudes on those who stand in the way of jewish supremacism. So let’s translate a statement made by olmert. "In a recent interview with German daily Bild Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert launched a scathing attack against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, referring to the Iranian president as a "psychopath" and comparing him to Adolf Hitler. "He is a psychopath of the worst kind," Olmert was quoted by the newspaper as saying. "He speaks as Hitler did in his time of the extermination of the entire Jewish nation."" (‘Olmert compares Ahmadinejad to Hitler’,2506,L-3245121,00.html March 29, 2006). What olmert is really saying is that he is a "psychopath of the worst kind," and that he "speaks as Hitler did in his time". A few months later olmert terrorized a million people out of southern lebanon and then plastered the region with at least four million cluster bombs.(26) Jewish zionists pour out these denunciations not because they fear these hitlers put their survival at risk but as a rationale for provoking world war three. Only nazis provoke world wars.

(1) According to one jewish politician. "In his speech, Netanyahu referred to historic claims that the Irgun movement was itself involved in terrorist actions, claiming that throughout its operations, the group had always refrained from targeting civilians, with the exception of the bombing at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in 1946. "Those who followed in Avraham Yair Stern's footsteps became members of the democratic Israeli parliament, while those who followed in Haj Amin al-Husseini's footsteps continue the murderous terror war to this day," said Netanyahu. "When we witness a terror attack, we know that if they could they would have murdered us all."" (Roni Arison ‘Bibi: Terrorists' propaganda reminiscent of Nazis'’,2506,L-3517325,00.html March 10, 2008).

(2) Avraham Stern, the founder and leader of the Zionist underground terrorist organization later known as Lehi and also known as the "Stern Gang," attempted to make an agreement with the Nazis in 1941. "Stern felt that the only salvation for the Jews was to produce their own Zionist form of totalitarianism," writes Lenni Brenner. "He had seen the WZO [World Zionist Organization] make its own accommodation with Nazism by means of the Ha’avara; he had seen [Ze’ev] Jabotinsky [an admirer of Mussolini] entangle himself with Italy; and he personally had been intimately involved in the Revisionists, dealings with the Polish anti-Semites." The Revisionist Party eventually mutated into Herut and finally Likud, the current political party ruling in Israel. Even though Likud is based on racism, terrorism, violence, territorial expansion, rabid nationalism, and ethnic cleansing, as was its predecessors, Steven Plaut believes Likud is guilty of "cowardice" (even as it repeatedly violates the Geneva Conventions and ignores United Nations resolutions by the dozen). In other words, according to Plaut, the Likudites are wimps and Ariel Sharon, indicted as a mass murderer and war criminal, is too "timid."" (Kurt Nimmo ‘Pantheon of Far Right-Wing Delusion: Plaut Calls the Fascist Kettle Black’ May 03, 2005); "This policy of attaching more importance to the establishment of Israel than to the survival of the Jews led the Zionists to collaborate with Nazism and even be decorated by Hitler's government. The best known case was that of Rudolf Kastner, who negotiated the emigration to Palestine of some of Hungary's most prominent Jews in return for his help in arranging the orderly deportation of the remainder of Hungary's Jews to the camps. For his efforts, Kastner was praised as an "idealist" by no less an authority than Adolf Eichmann. (The best study of Zionist-Nazi relations is Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.)" (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’ Counterpunch 17.06.2004).

(3) See also:
Kurt Nimmo.
"Zionism is all about running Palestinians off the land. "I support compulsory transfer," or ethnic cleansing, declared David Ben-Gurion in 1937. "I don’t see anything immoral in it." For Zionists, the Palestinians are "the rocks of Judea, as obstacles that had to be cleared on a difficult path," as Chaim Weizmann saw it. Weisglass’ mentor, Ze’ev Jabotinsky, believed there was "no choice: the Arabs must make room for the Jews of Eretz Israel." According to Yitzhak Avira, a Haganah Intelligence Service officer, the Zionist view in 1948 was that "the [Palestinian] Arabs are nothing. Every [Palestinian] Arab is a murderer, all of them should be slaughtered, all the [Palestinian] villages that are conquered should be burned." Of course, in 2006, it would be impossible to kill every Palestinian and burn every Palestinian village, so instead the Zionist state has decided to slowly asphyxiate the Palestinians." (Kurt Nimmo ‘Olmert: Starving Palestinians to Death’ February 27th 2006).

Kathleen Christison.
"The Israeli-U.S. strategy for Palestine is now crystal clear: overturn the will of the people (in this case as expressed through democratic elections), kill off any resistance (Hamas in this case, along with any civilians who might get in the way), co-opt a quisling leadership (Fatah and Mahmoud Abbas), push out and kill if necessary as many people as international opinion will allow, ultimately rid Palestine of most Palestinians. The cast of characters and organizations has changed from earlier times, but this has essentially been Israel's strategy from the beginning." (Kathleen Christison ‘The Siren Song of Elliott Abrams’ July 26, 2007).

(4) See also:
Jennifer Loewenstein.
"Hamas' reward for coming to power just in time to provide all the aspiring Sharons the most perfect, served-up-on-a-silver-platter pretext for continuing their well-worn policies with a vengeance, has been for the Kadima party, the party of the future, to announce that it will put the Palestinians on a starvation diet for presuming to exercise their rights." (Jennifer Loewenstein ‘Watching the Dissolution of Palestine’ February 24, 2006).

Kurt Nimmo.
"It should now be obvious Israel fully intends to starve as many Palestinians to death as possible." (Kurt Nimmo ‘Olmert: Starving Palestinians to Death’ February 27, 2006).

Ramzy Baroud.
"Only time and more media leaked plots will reveal what is to transpire. However, the early signs, that of Israel's intention to starve Palestinians through sanctions, coupled with unequalled enthusiasm among US lawmakers to punish Palestinians for electing Hamas, makes the coming Israeli and US foreign policy course even more predictable. While Israel sees little harm in making Palestinians a 'whole lot thinner' as a result of its economic sanctions policy, the US' rash response in chastising Palestinians will likely scar US credibility, or whatever remains of it." (Ramzy Baroud ‘Middle East Democracy: The Hamas Factor’ March 02, 2006).

Uri Avnery.
"To this must be added the blockade imposed on the Palestinian Authority by Europe and America, by order of President Bush. This is an unprecedented attempt to literally starve a whole people into removing its democratically elected government." (Uri Avnery ‘The Evil Conspiracy of the Peacemongers!’ September 18, 2006).

Jonathan Cook.
"Their (Vilnai and Barak) ultimate goal appears to be related to Vilnai’s "shoah" comment: Gaza’s depopulation, with the Strip squeezed on three sides until the pressure forces Palestinians to break out again into Egypt. This time, it may be assumed, there will be no chance of return." (Jonathan Cook ‘Israel Plots Another Palestinian Exodus: The Meaning of Gaza's 'Shoah'’ March 8-9, 2008).

(5) There were direct deportations but also soft deportations. "Israel has had a practice for years of trying to empty out the West Bank of its young Palestinian men. When a young Palestinian would leave home to go to college in another country, the Shin Bet would visit the young man’s parents, telling them that their son was wanted for unspecified crimes that were made up on the spot. The reaction of the parents was predictable. They would get word to their son that the Shin Bet was looking for him, and that he should never come back to Palestine. One such Palestinian, Sami Ismail, who was attending college in Michigan in the 1970s, learned that his father was seriously ill. He immediately made plans to return to the West Bank for what he was certain would be his father’s funeral. The FBI, which obviously had been watching Sami, informed the Shin Bet that he was on his way back to Israel. He was arrested at the Tel Aviv airport and put in prison. After being beaten and tortured, he was, a few years later, released and is now back in Michigan." (James Abourezk ‘The Bully of the Middle East’ Review of John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy’ September 10th, 2007). The soft form of deportation has even been imposed on palestinian israelis who are supposed to have far more rights than their stateless palestinian counterparts. "Israel cancelled the east Jerusalem residence permits of a record number of Palestinians in 2006, effectively expelling them from the city, the human rights groups B'Tselem said on Sunday. A total of 1,363 Palestinians had their residence permits withdrawn last year compared with just 222 in 2005, the watchdog said, basing its figures on interior ministry statistics." (‘Israel expels record number of east Jerusalem Arabs’ June 24, 2007).

(6) The situation became even worse after 2005 when the jews pulled out of gaza. Palestinians were as oppressed and stateless after the jews withdrew from gaza as they’d been whilst under military occupation. "The recent crisis reveals, once more, that Israel's August 2005 unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip was not an act of decolonization but rather the reorganization of Israeli power and the implementation of neo-colonial rule. Israel realized that in order to maintain sovereignty all it would have to do is preserve its monopoly over the legitimate means of movement. Very different from the withdrawal of British forces from the various colonies of old, it accordingly continued to dominate Gaza's borders, transforming the Strip into a container of sorts whose openings are totally controlled by Israel." (Neve Gordon ‘An Experiment in Famine: Hamas is Not the Real Issue’ January 30, 2008).

(7) See also:
Uri Avnery.
"The Gaza Strip is the largest prison on earth." (Uri Avnery ‘The Blockade of Gaza: Worse Than a Crime’ January 26/27, 2008).

Neve Gordon.
After five days of extreme suffering, a group of Hamas militants took the lead, and blew-up parts of the steel wall along the Egyptian border. Within hours more than 100,000 Gazans crossed the border into Egypt. They were hungry, thirsty and sick of being locked up in a filthy cage. Once in Egypt they bought everything they could get their hands on and waited patiently for the international community to intervene on their behalf. Yet the world leaders failed them again, and on January 28, after a five day respite, the iron wall was re-erected and the Palestinians were pushed back into the world's largest prison, the Gaza Strip." (Neve Gordon ‘An Experiment in Famine: Hamas is Not the Real Issue’ January 30, 2008).

Jonathan Cook.
"In charge of an open-air prison, Hamas has refused to surrender to Israeli diktats and has proven invulnerable to Israeli and US machinations to topple it. Instead it has begun advancing the only two feasible forms of resistance available: rocket attacks over the fence surrounding Gaza, and popular mass action." (Jonathan Cook ‘Israel Plots Another Palestinian Exodus: The Meaning of Gaza's 'Shoah'’ March 8-9, 2008).

(8) "But this is not the first time that Vilnai has expressed extreme views about Gaza’s future. Last summer he began quietly preparing a plan on behalf of his boss, the Defence Minister Ehud Barak, to declare Gaza a "hostile entity" and dramatically reduce the essential services supplied by Israel, as long-time occupier, to its inhabitants, including electricity and fuel. The cuts were finally implemented late last year after the Israeli courts gave their blessing. Under international law, Israel as the occupying power has an obligation to guarantee the welfare of the civilian population in Gaza, a fact forgotten when the media reported Israel’s decision to declare Gaza a hostile entity. The pair (Vilnai and Barak) have therefore claimed tendentiously that the humanitarian needs of Gazans are still being safeguarded by the limited supplies being allowed through, and that therefore the measures do not constitute collective punishment. Last October, after a meeting of defense officials, Vilnai said of Gaza: "Because this is an entity that is hostile to us, there is no reason for us to supply them with electricity beyond the minimum required to prevent a crisis." (Jonathan Cook ‘Israel Plots Another Palestinian Exodus: The Meaning of Gaza's 'Shoah'’ March 8-9, 2008).

The jews-only state’s decision to turn gaza into a concentration camp has recently been given approval by the zionist supreme court. "The Israeli Supreme Court has approved this policy of mass, brutal collective punishment of over 1.4 million civilians. (Haaretz February 2, 2008). They have imposed a tight blockade on food and medical supplies resulting in what the United Nations officials and international human rights groups have called a humanitarian disaster of unprecedented magnitude with widespread disease and famine becoming a reality. The Israeli Army blocks even the movement of sick and critically injured children. The Israeli judicial system led by its Supreme Court judges has ruled in favor of the power cuts, bombing of generators and water treatment plants and blockage of food, providing an unprecedented ‘legal’ framework for genocide." (James Petras ‘The Israeli Agenda and the Scorecard of the Zionist Power Configuration for 2008’ February 2008).

(9) See also:
Gilad Atzmon.
"The British government announced this month it would give £4.65 million to the Holocaust Educational Trust set up in 1988 to educate young people about the Holocaust. Instead of sending British youngsters to Auschwitz, I would suggest spending governmental funds on student trips to Gaza concentration camp. This would have a far greater educational value in so as far as challenging 'racism and prejudice'. Clearly it is in Gaza where millions of Palestinians are starved by the Jewish state while the West keeps silent." (Gilad Atzmon ‘Send Them To Gaza: Gimmicks and Education’ February 26, 2008); "In spite of the facts that are right in front of our eyes, in spite of the starvation in Gaza, in spite of an Israeli official admitting genocidal inclinations against the Palestinians, in spite of the mounting carnage and death, we are still afraid to admit that Gaza is a concentration camp and it is on the verge of becoming a deadly one. Bearing all that in mind, equating Gaza with Auschwitz is the right and only way forwards." (Gilad Atzmon ‘Freedom of Speech: the right to equate Gaza with Auschwitz’ March 01, 2008).

Ramzy Baroud.
"The facts, as demonstrated by the US-Israeli role in the turmoil in Lebanon, the consistent attempt to arraign Iran, and the Israeli provocations and bombings in Syria, all indicate that Israel's plans are regional, with Gaza being a testing ground, and the least costly target to isolate and brutalize. Already a massive concentration camp with a largely starving population, Gaza has provided Israel with a perfect opportunity to start sending stern messages to the other players in the region." (Ramzy Baroud ‘Big bang or chaos: What's Israel up to?’ Mar 12, 2008).

(10) See also:
Ilan Pappe.
"Israel controls the life of two groups of Palestinians: there are the Palestinian citizens inside Israel and there are the Palestinians under Occupation. These are very two different groups. I think the group under Occupation is under grave threat, there is still a very serious possibility that this people will be ethnically cleansed, once again, and that mass killing will be performed against it." (Prof. Ilan Pappe quoted in Steve Zeltzer ‘Ilan Pappe on the Israel-Palestine conflict’ Labor Video Project cable TV program October 29, 2005). At that moment in time, pappe was still optimistic. "Here we are really talking about almost genocide, in the future. Although I don’t think this will really happen and I hope that the world will not stand aside." (Prof. Ilan Pappe quoted in Steve Zeltzer ‘Ilan Pappe on the Israel-Palestine conflict’ Labor Video Project cable TV program October 29, 2005). No longer. "Israeli historian Ilan Pappe has said that genocide "is the only appropriate way to describe what the Israeli army is doing in the Gaza Strip" after much thought and deliberation." (Laila El-Haddad ‘The Gaza genocide’ March 02, 2008).

Genevieve Cora Fraser.
"For nearly six decades Palestinians have been systematically ethnically cleaned, driven off their land, and Israel has all too often prevented food deliveries as well as access to medicines and water (as documented by hundreds of UN Resolutions against Israel). However, the complete economic deprivation that Israel insists on, in this writer’s opinion, is far beyond a slap in the face at democracy by refusing to acknowledge a Hamas-led government, but an attempt to commit genocide against the Palestinian people." (Genevieve Cora Fraser ‘Israeli Defense Minister Declares Palestine "Axis of Evil" February 23, 2006).

Saree Makdisi.
"Israel's methodical actions make it clear that it is systematically grinding down and now actually starving people for whose welfare it is legally accountable simply because it regards Gaza's 1.5 million men, women and children as a surplus population it would, quite simply, like to get rid of one way or the other: a sentiment made quite clear when Israel's chief Ashkenazi rabbi proposed, shortly after the current crisis began, that the entire Palestinian population of Gaza should just be removed and transferred to the Egyptian desert. "They will have a nice country, and we shall have our country and we shall live in peace," he said, without eliciting even a murmur of protest in Israel." (Saree Makdisi ‘Abbas Must Be Called to Account: Strangling Gaza’ February 4, 2008).

Laila El-Haddad.
"But the real genocide in Gaza cannot or will not be assessed through sheer numbers. It is not a massacre of gas chambers. No. It is a slow and calculated genocide, a genocide through more calibrated, long-term means. And if the term is used in any context, it should be this. In many ways, this is a more sinister genocide, because it tends to be overlooked: all is ok in Gaza, the wasteland, the hostile territory that is accustomed to slaughter and survival; Gaza, whose people are somehow less human; we should not take note, need not take note, unless there is a mass killing or starvation." (Laila El-Haddad ‘The Gaza genocide’ March 02, 2008).

Abd al-Bari Atwan.
"(Israeli journalist Gideon) Levy explained that Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak wanted to demonstrate to the Israeli public that he was "doing something" about the regular launching of rockets from Gaza. Although Levy wasn't justifying the Israeli government's inhumane and misguided logic, he disagreed with (al-Quds al-Arabi editor-in-chief Abd al-Bari) Atwan over the use of terminology. The latter (who is also an outstanding journalist) had asserted that the killings in Gaza represented a form of "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing". Arab intellectuals, often wary of the use of certain terminology, since Western sensibilities don't accept associating Israel with genocide and ethnic cleansing, became less hesitant after Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai warned Palestinians in a radio interview to expect a "bigger Holocaust"." (Ramzy Baroud ‘Big bang or chaos: What's Israel up to?’ Mar 12, 2008).

(11) "In the Holocaust three million Polish Jews died, but so did three million non-Jewish Poles. Jews were targeted but so were Gypsies, homosexuals, Slavs and Poles." (Paul Eisen ‘Jewish Power’ August 19, 2004).

(12) "The hysteria over Iran, which may lead to a disastrous war that will be lost by everyone, reminiscent of the First World War of 1914-1918, is visibly fed by the dominance within the Jewish community, and indeed beyond it in the West as a whole, of the "duty of memory", meaning, to be precise, a constant, repetitive recollection of the holocaust as the defining moment of the twentieth century, and perhaps even of human history." (Diana Johnstone ‘Pre-Emptive Strike Against Chirac. Frenzy in France Over "Iranian Threat"’ February 6, 2007).

(13) See for example:
Matan Vilnai's Aides.
"The use of the term "holocaust" is usually restricted to descriptions of the Nazi genocide of the Jews in Europe in the Second World War, and many Israelis resent its use in any other context. Mr Vilnai’s deployment of the word appeared to show Israel’s growing frustration that Hamas and other militant groups in Gaza refuse to curb their attacks, despite heavy tolls inflicted in Israeli air strikes and tank raids. As Israeli media relayed his controversial comments, Mr Vilnai’s spokesman was forced to issue a clarification. "The minister used the Hebrew term 'shoah' which means 'catastrophe' and in this context does not refer to the 'the Shoah, the Holocaust," he said." (James Hider ‘Israel threatens to unleash 'holocaust' in Gaza’ March 1, 2008); "Vilnai's aides released a statement saying the former career army officer had only meant to imply a disaster. Others defended him as a victim of sloppy out-of-context translation. Tom Gross, a media affairs columnist for the conservative National Review Online, said there was a major difference between "a shoah" and "THE shoah." "It is like confusing a 'white house' with 'The White House,' " Gross wrote." (Ashraf Khalil ‘Israeli's use of 'holocaust' has fallout’ March 2, 2008); "But Vilnai's spokesman took strong exception to media reports that quoted the minister calling for a "Holocaust" in Gaza. "The minister used the Hebrew term 'shoah' which means 'catastrophe' and in this context does not refer to the 'the Shoah', the Holocaust," Eytan Guinsburg said on Friday." (Ali Waked ‘Abbas: IDF's Gaza operation worse than a holocaust’,7340,L-3513195,00.html March 01, 2008); "His comment, picked up by the Reuters wire service, was soon making headlines around the world. Presumably uncomfortable with a senior public figure in Israel comparing his government’s policies to the Nazi plan to exterminate European Jewry, many news services referred to Vilnai’s clearly articulated threat as a "warning", as though he was prophesying a cataclysmic natural event over which he and the Israeli army had no control. Nonetheless, officials understood the damage that the translation from Hebrew of Vilnai’s remark could do to Israel’s image abroad. Within hours the Israeli Foreign Ministry was launching a large "hasbara" (propaganda) campaign through its diplomats, as the Jerusalem Post reported. In a related move, a spokesman for Vilnai explained that the word "shoah" also meant "disaster"; this, rather than a holocaust, was what the minister had been referring to. Clarifications were issued by many media outlets. However, no one in Israel was fooled. "Shoah", which literally means "burnt offering", was long ago reserved for the Holocaust, much as the Arabic word "nakba" (or "catastrophe") is nowadays used only to refer to the Palestinians’ dispossession by Israel in 1948. Certainly, the Israeli media in English translated Vilnai’s use of "shoah" as "holocaust"." (Jonathan Cook ‘Israel Plots Another Palestinian Exodus: The Meaning of Gaza's 'Shoah'’ March 8-9, 2008); "The BBC later reported that "many of Mr. Vilnai's colleagues have quickly distanced themselves from his comments and also tried to downplay them saying he did not mean genocide." An Israeli foreign ministry spokesman, Arye Mekel, claimed that Vilnai used the word "in the sense of a disaster or a catastrophe, and not in the sense of a holocaust."" (Ali Abunimah ‘Israeli Minister Threatens "Holocaust" as Public Demand Ceasefire Talks’ February 29, 2008).

David Landau.
One jewish commentator insisted the word shoah was a commonly used word and thus of no political significance. Alan rusbridger, the guardian's editor "was also taken to task by (former Haaretz editor David) Landau over his publication's explanation of the word "shoah" in an edition last week, in reference to Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilna'i's comments that the Palestinians would be "bringing a greater shoah because we will use all our strength in every way we deem appropriate, whether in air strikes or on the ground." Landau said that he could not accept that the Guardian would choose to use a headline with the word "Holocaust." "I can't accept that the correspondent or sub-editor, or whoever was involved in the story, seriously thought that they could justify the use of the word Holocaust, with uppercase 'H,' in the headline attributed to the Israeli minister, and that with all sincerity and with no disingenuousness reflecting it as honestly meaning what the man said," Landau said. The second paragraph of the article says that the word "shoah" is almost invariably used to mean the Holocaust; Landau questioned whether that was meant to imply that the deputy minister had that in mind. The former Haaretz editor said that as someone who has been speaking Hebrew for the past 40 years, he knew that it was not always the case. Rusbridger conceded that Landau "may be right" and talked about the difficulties in news reporting and the way in which writing has changed over the years, with the Internet pulling information out of context." (Jonny Paul 'Guardian' editor apologizes for Jenin editorial’ March 4, 2008).

Uri Avnery.
"As if an example for the folly of the propagators of this concept had been lacking, it was provided on TV by ex-general Matan Vilnai, when he said that the Palestinians are "bringing a Shoah on themselves". The Hebrew word Shoah is known all over the world, where it has one clear meaning: the Holocaust carried out by the Nazis against the Jews. Vilnai's utterance spread like a bushfire throughout the Arab world and set off a shock wave. I, too, received dozens of phone calls and e-mail messages from all over the world. How to convince people that in day-to-day Hebrew usage, Shoah means "only" a great disaster, and that General Vilnai, a former candidate for Chief of Staff, is not the most intelligent of people?" (Uri Avnery "Kill a Hundred Turks and Rest": The Five-Day War in Gaza March 10, 2008). In other words, when jews talk amongst themselves they are able to use the word lower case ‘shoah’ to mean any old disaster but when they are talking to non jews they use upper case ‘Shoah’ to mean the nazis’ nakba against european jews.

(14) See also:
Ashraf Khalil.
"As the three-day death toll in Gaza climbed toward triple digits, senior Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal accused Israel of "implementing a real holocaust against the Palestinian people for the past 60 years. What is happening today in Gaza is a new holocaust." The non governmental Palestinian Information Center issued a statement calling Vilnai's words "the first indirect admission by an Israeli official that what Israel is conducting against the Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is a holocaust, albeit a slow-motion one." But Saturday, even Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, a bitter rival of the Islamic movement Hamas, called the Israeli incursion into Hamas-run Gaza "more than a holocaust."" (Ashraf Khalil ‘Israeli's use of 'holocaust' has fallout’ March 2, 2008).

Mahmoud Abbas.
"Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Saturday denounced a deadly Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip that has killed at least 33 people as "more than a holocaust." "It's very regrettable that what is happening is more than a holocaust. We tell the world to see with its own eyes and judge for itself what is happening and who is carrying out international terrorism," Abbas told reporters in Ramallah. Abbas was responding to remarks made by Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilani, who said Friday that the Palestinians would bring on themselves what he called a "bigger holocaust" by stepping up rocket attacks on Israel from Gaza. "It is regrettable that Israel uses this word, banned for more than 60 years, the word 'holocaust,' and we demand that the world respond," Abbas said." (Ali Waked ‘Abbas: IDF's Gaza operation worse than a holocaust’,7340,L-3513195,00.html March 01, 2008).

Khalid Amayreh.
"In June, 1942, in reprisal for the assassination of the Nazi commander Reinhard Heydrich, the Germans carried out a murderous rampage of murder and terror throughout Czechoslovakia. The small Czech village of Lidice bore the brunt of the German revenge, with the SS killing all the men, deported all women and children and razed the village to the ground. Now what is the difference between these Nazi atrocities and what Israel, the "only democracy in the Middle East" is doing in the Gaza Strip, where "the most moral army in the world" is slaughtering babies as young as six-months’ old? I know that many Jews, especially Zionist Jews, have developed almost instinctive knee-jerk defensive reactions to any comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany. However, the truth must be proclaimed aloud, irrespective of how many Zionists will get angry. Hence, Jews around the world, especially those who support Israel, should be willing to bring themselves to recognizing that what their wonderful state is doing to these helpless Palestinians is a virtual holocaust or at least a holocaust in the making." (Khalid Amayreh ‘Jews and the Gaza Holocaust’ March 1, 2008).

(15) Many of the students who attend Mercaz HaRav belong to the settlement movement." (‘Yesha rabbis: Government responsible for yeshiva massacre’,7340,L-3516098,00.html March 07, 2008).

(16) See also. "The chairman of the Yesha rabbinical council and chief rabbi of Kiryat Arba, Rabbi Dov Lior, on Wednesday issued a halakhic ruling stating that it is forbidden by Jewish law to employ Arabs or rent homes to them. In an interview published by "Eretz Israel Shelanu" (Our Land of Israel), to be distributed this Saturday in various synagogues, Lior said that "since this is a matter of endangering souls, it is clear that it is completely forbidden to employ them and rent houses to them in Israel. Their employment is forbidden not only at yeshivas, but at factories, hotels and everywhere." Recently, several rabbis led by Rabbi Lior have issued a precedent setting halakhic ruling that Israel must shoot civilian populations in areas from whence attacks on Jewish communities originate." (Nadav Shragai ‘Top Yesha rabbi says Jewish law forbids renting houses to Arabs’ March 20, 2008).

(17) Politicians around the world face repercussions if they do not interpret this revenge attack in the way zionists desire. "Walid's fatal misstep for serious consideration to lead Lebanon was his comment last week that the Jerusalem attack on the Jewish Religious Institution, which killed 8 students, was a predictable reaction to the Israeli terrorism in Gaza. In Washington that is roughly the equivalent of "Client #9" doing Miss Kristen. That verbal act by Jumblatt sunk him and the previously admiring Israel lobby dropped him like a bad habit." (Franklin Lamb ‘Is the Bush Administration Switching Horses in Lebanon?’ March 14, 2008).

(18) "In today’s (March 12, 2002) Ha’aretz, Amnon Barzilai reports on the new opinion poll carried out by the Jaffa Institute of Strategic Studies. According to it, 46 per cent of Jews in Israel support mass deportation (transfer) of the Palestinians. If the question is asked in a more ‘soft’ form, the support for the Final Solution rises to 60 per cent. Nazis never openly declared their intention to massacre Jews and Gypsies, they spoke of ‘deportation’ and ‘transfer’ as their ‘Final Solution’. Even in 1938, these ideas did not have such wholehearted support in Nazi Germany, as they have now in the Jewish state." (Aijaz Ahmad ‘The Nazification of Israel’ Spring 2003).

(19) By brazenly resorting to Nazi-style rhetoric and methods of persecution in Palestine, Israel, with the consent of the majority of its own people and the unlimited support of the United States, perpetrates the kind of crimes that the Jewish state claims as the raison d’etre of its own creation in 1948. A decisive shift that has been perceptible for some time seems now to be substantially in place in Israel, from settler-colonialism of the familiar kind to full-scale Nazification. For virtually the whole of its existence, Israel has modelled itself upon the South African racist regime of the apartheid days: a settler colony, calling itself a "Jewish state" and asserting a manifest right to "the Biblical lands" for a "Chosen People" defined by race and religion, it has been unwilling to grant equal rights to the original inhabitants of the land owing to differences of race and religion, and unwilling even to pay compensation, let alone a right of return, to refugees created by its colonial wars. Instead, Israel has relentlessly carried out a policy that Nelson Mandela has called "worse than apartheid" and the Speaker of the Greek Parliament has recently characterised as "genocide." Even in the earlier stages of the present assault, Ze’ev Sternhell, Israel’s leading scholar on fascism, could already write that the government "is no longer ashamed to speak of war when what they are really engaged in is colonial policing, which recalls the takeover by the white police of the poor neighbourhoods of the blacks in South Africa during the apartheid era." The point that Israel is actively acting on the model of the Nazis was made, for example, by Assaf Oran, one of the more than one thousand Israeli reservists who have refused military duty in the current war on the Palestinian people, in an ‘Open Letter to American Jews’ which he published on the eve of Passover this year, in response to a massive outpouring of anger against his ‘refusenik’ comrades: "Where were all these holy souls, who now scold Tikkun [an organisation supporting ‘refuseniks’] because they indirectly allude to the Nazi horrors, where were they all when a senior IDF [Israeli Defence Forces] officer proudly called, ‘in order to beat the Palestinians, let’s be Judeo-Nazis’." The well-known Israeli daily Ma’ariv has also quoted an Israeli officer exhorting his men to study the tactics adopted by the Nazis during the Second World War: "If our job is to seize a densely packed refugee camp or take over the Nablus Casbah, and if this job is to be given to an Israeli officer to carry out without casualties he must before all else analyse and bring together the lessons of past battles, even, shocking though this might appear, to analyse how the German Army operated in the Warsaw Ghetto."" (Aijaz Ahmad ‘The Nazification of Israel’ Spring 2003).

(20) Indeed, throughout the history of zionism, zionists have deliberately stirred up anti-semitism because it is their best tool for forcing assimilated jews to move to palestine.

(21) "The reason Jews went quietly is not a mystery. Jewish leadership betrayed them. Hilberg attributes it partly to an age-old Jewish habit of persevering in the face of overwhelming odds. But a more important factor is that both Jewish world leadership and the Judenrats were dominated by Zionists." (Henry Makow ‘The Holocaust As Mental Paradigm Why The Jews Didn't Resist’ January 28, 2003).

(22) The reciprocity between the nazis and zionists would only be of historical interest if the jews-only state had transformed itself into a secular, liberal, multi-cultural, democracy like other countries in the western world. But it has refused to do so. The jews-only state has continual engaged in pre-emptive wars, continually organized black operations like the lavon affair to provoke more wars, it has continually stolen land from palestinians and sought to turn them into stateless refugees in their own country.

(23) The ‘war against terrorism’ quickly became a war against ‘terrorists threatening the jews-only state’. It then became the long war. "The Pentagon has officially retired the phrase "The Long War" as the designated moniker for the Bush Administration's global wars. Apparently the head of Central Command, Admiral William J. Fallon, phased out the phrase because of the message it sends to countries around the globe that U.S. forces are intent on occupying foreign nations for extended periods of time (It is startling to consider what isn't obvious to the Pentagon). Now Bush's reckless wars are nameless. For the past year, General John Abizaid had pushed the term "the Long War" as the preferred phrase for Bush's terror wars, but outside the select group of military and intelligence insiders this name never really caught on. When I first heard a Pentagon spokesperson say, "the Long War" I was startled to hear someone so openly admit that this really was supposed to be the war without end that we all assumed it would become. We all know that Pentagon spokespersons aren't supposed to be this honest." (David Price ‘This Occupation Shall Remain Nameless. The Long Lost War’ April 25, 2007). Bush has hinted that it is now the third world war.

(24) "But while you and I get depressed by the horror and suffering, the neo-conservatives revel in it. They devour the flesh and drink the blood of the people of Afghanistan, of Iraq, of Palestine, of Lebanon, yet remain ravenous, and now call for Iran and Syria to be placed upon the feasting table. More than one of them has used the expression oderint dum metuant, a favorite phrase of Roman emperor Caligula, also used by Cicero, "let them hate so long as they fear". Here is William Kristol, editor of the bible of neo-cons, "Weekly Standard", on Fox News Sunday, July 16: "Look, our coddling of Iran ... over the last six to nine months has emboldened them. I mean, is Iran behaving like a timid regime that's very worried about the U.S.? Or is Iran behaving recklessly and in a foolhardy way? ... Israel is fighting four of our five enemies in the Middle East, in a sense. Iran, Syria, sponsors of terror; Hezbollah and Hamas. ... This is an opportunity to begin to reverse the unfortunate direction of the last six to nine months and get the terrorists and the jihadists back on the defensive." Host Juan Williams replied: "Well, it just seems to me that you want ... you just want war, war, war, and you want us in more war. You wanted us in Iraq. Now you want us in Iran. Now you want us to get into the Middle East ... you're saying, why doesn't the United States take this hard, unforgiving line? Well, the hard and unforgiving line has been [tried], we don't talk to anybody. We don't talk to Hamas. We don't talk to Hezbollah. We're not going to talk to Iran. Where has it gotten us, Bill?"" (William Blum ‘They simply can't stop lying, can they?’ July 26, 2006).

(25) "Gillerman's remarks during an appearance on CNN, where he was spurred on by host Anderson Cooper's comparison of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah to Adolf Hitler. "I certainly hope the world understands [that] this war is not just about the safety of Israel or the freedom of Lebanon, it is about preserving civilization as we know it," Gillerman said." (Mark Perry and Alastair Crooke ‘The loser in Lebanon: The Atlantic alliance’ August 8, 2006); "On July 12th, for example, the mass-circulation Israeli newspaper Maariv compared Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah to Hitler, saying that it left Israel with 'one choice: To respond with might, in one fell swoop, unless it does not wish to live!' The resonance with Menachem Begin's justification for carpet bombing Beirut in 1982 was unavoidable. Then, Begin had compared Yasser Arafat to Hitler, hiding in a bunker surrounded by civilians." (Arthur Neslen ‘What Made Israel Burn Lebanon, Again?’ September 20, 2006).

(26) This is one that readers can try for themselves at home. Here’s olmie: "In a special Knesset session Monday marking the International Holocaust Remembrance Day, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert drew a parallel between the current threat of a nuclear Iran and the Third Reich. He added that Israel could not afford to stand by while other nations called for its annihilation. While he did not name Iran, he said the Jewish state must defend itself against calls "premised on zealous, murderous ideology, a tyrannical terror-supporting regime that recklessly aspires for regional hegemony, and a malicious program for developing weapons of mass destruction."" (Sheera Claire Frenkel ‘PM: Jews will never again be powerless’ January 29, 2008). Olmert’s fantasy about iran is really a precise analysis of the jews-only state in palestine. The jews-only state is "premised on zealous, murderous ideology, a tyrannical terror-supporting regime that recklessly aspires for regional hegemony, and a malicious program for developing weapons of mass destruction."

Labels: , , ,


Post a Comment

<< Home